MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979695032 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.2787.2787

Long-Term Follow-up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

2012· article· en· W2979695032 sur OpenAlexaff
Hagop M. Kantarjian, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Michele Baccarani, Franck E. Nicolini, Meir Wetzler, Luke P. Akard, Laurence Legros, Krzysztof Warzocha, Adam Craig, Jörge E. Cortes

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTolerabilityInternal medicineMyeloid leukemiaAdverse effectPhases of clinical researchOncologyGastroenterologyClinical trial

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2787 Background Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is an investigational, first-in-class cephalotaxine, a protein synthesis inhibitor that does not depend on direct binding of Bcr-Abl. Omacetaxine reduces levels of multiple oncoproteins, including Bcr-Abl, and induces apoptosis in leukemic stem cells. It has shown clinical activity and adequate tolerability in two phase 2, open-label studies of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the first in patients with a history of the T315I Bcr-Abl mutation (enrolled September 2006 through March 2010) and the second in patients with resistance or intolerance to ≥2 approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; enrolled March 2007 through June 2009). This ad hoc analysis presents the efficacy and safety results of patients in the phase 2 studies who remained on omacetaxine as of March 31, 2012. Methods Efficacy and safety data were pooled from patients with CML chronic phase (CML-CP) and CML accelerated phase (CML-AP) who received omacetaxine in either of the phase 2 studies and had not discontinued omacetaxine as of March 31, 2012. Omacetaxine 1.25 mg/m2was given subcutaneously twice daily up to 14 consecutive days per 28-day cycle for induction and at the same dosage for up to 7 days/cycle as maintenance. Results Of the 203 patients enrolled in the 2 studies (108 CML-CP, 51 CML-AP, and 44 CML blast phase), 9 CML-CP patients (median 35 cycles [range 26–53]) and 2 CML-AP patients (median 20.5 cycles [range 19–22]) continue to receive omacetaxine. Median age of ongoing CML-CP patients at baseline was 61 years (range 45–73); 7 were male. Median age of ongoing CML-AP patients was 58 years (range 48–67); all were male. For CML-CP patients, the median number of dosing days was 137 (range 68–342) over a median of 35 cycles (range 26–53); the 2 CML-AP patients had 189 and 277 dosing days during 19 and 22 cycles, respectively. Other baseline clinical characteristics are presented in the Table. Seven of the CML-CP patients achieved MCyR, including 6 complete responses. One CML-CP patient achieved a minimal cytogenetic response and 1 had no response. No CML-AP patient achieved MCyR. Time to onset of MCyR for the CML-CP patients were <3 months (n=2), 3 to <6 months (n=2), and 6 to <12 months (n=3). In the 7 patients with MCyR, duration of response to date is ≥6 to <12 (n=3), ≥12 to <18 (n=2), and ≥18 months (n=2); none lost response. Six CML-CP patients were in CHR at baseline and 3 achieved CHR within 3 months. One CML-AP patient achieved CHR at <3 months and 1 only had hematologic improvement. Eight of the 9 CML-CP patients and 1 CML-AP patient remained in CHR at time of analysis, whereas 1 CML-CP patient lost response in ≥6 to <12 months (patient had minimal cytogenetic response). At the last recorded cycle, the number of dosing days for CML-CP patients ranged from 1–12 days and 7–15 days in CML-AP patients; number of days of treatment delay ranged from 0–4 days in CML-CP patients and 0–33 days in the 2 CML-AP patients. All patients had at least 1 AE and 1 serious AE. The most common AEs were anemia (11/11), thrombocytopenia (9/11), neutropenia (6/11), nausea (7/11), diarrhea or fatigue (5/11 each), and headache (4/11). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 10 (91%) patients. The most common were hematologic: thrombocytopenia (79% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(79\) \end{document} CML-CP, 100% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(22\) \end{document} CML-AP), anemia (67% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(49\) \end{document} CML-CP, 100% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(22\) \end{document} CML-AP), and neutropenia (56% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(59\) \end{document} CML-CP, 0% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(02\) \end{document} CML-AP). Leukopenia and pancytopenia were reported in 1 patient each in the CML-AP group. Blast crisis, which was deemed treatment-related, was reported in 1 patient in the CML-AP group; this patient was discontinued. No deaths were reported. Conclusions A subset of heavily pretreated patients with CP or AP CML who participated in phase 2 studies of omacetaxine were able to continue omacetaxine for up to 53 cycles and experience durable major cytogenetic and hematologic responses. Grade 3/4 AEs were primarily hematologic and consistent with the known safety profile of omacetaxine. Disclosures: Kantarjian: ChemGenex (Teva): Research Funding. Off Label Use: Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is a protein synthesis inhibitor that does not depend on direct binding of Bcr-Abl. Omacetaxine has shown clinical activity in 2 studies of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), one in patients with a history of the T315I Bcr-Abl mutation and the other in patients failing at least 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Baccarani:Teva: Research Funding. Nicolini:BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Speakers Bureau. Wetzler:Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding. Akard:Merck: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Eisai: Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Legros:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Craig:Teva: Consultancy. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Chemgenex (Teva): Consultancy, Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,302
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207