Long-Term Follow-up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 2787 Background Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is an investigational, first-in-class cephalotaxine, a protein synthesis inhibitor that does not depend on direct binding of Bcr-Abl. Omacetaxine reduces levels of multiple oncoproteins, including Bcr-Abl, and induces apoptosis in leukemic stem cells. It has shown clinical activity and adequate tolerability in two phase 2, open-label studies of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the first in patients with a history of the T315I Bcr-Abl mutation (enrolled September 2006 through March 2010) and the second in patients with resistance or intolerance to ≥2 approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; enrolled March 2007 through June 2009). This ad hoc analysis presents the efficacy and safety results of patients in the phase 2 studies who remained on omacetaxine as of March 31, 2012. Methods Efficacy and safety data were pooled from patients with CML chronic phase (CML-CP) and CML accelerated phase (CML-AP) who received omacetaxine in either of the phase 2 studies and had not discontinued omacetaxine as of March 31, 2012. Omacetaxine 1.25 mg/m2was given subcutaneously twice daily up to 14 consecutive days per 28-day cycle for induction and at the same dosage for up to 7 days/cycle as maintenance. Results Of the 203 patients enrolled in the 2 studies (108 CML-CP, 51 CML-AP, and 44 CML blast phase), 9 CML-CP patients (median 35 cycles [range 26–53]) and 2 CML-AP patients (median 20.5 cycles [range 19–22]) continue to receive omacetaxine. Median age of ongoing CML-CP patients at baseline was 61 years (range 45–73); 7 were male. Median age of ongoing CML-AP patients was 58 years (range 48–67); all were male. For CML-CP patients, the median number of dosing days was 137 (range 68–342) over a median of 35 cycles (range 26–53); the 2 CML-AP patients had 189 and 277 dosing days during 19 and 22 cycles, respectively. Other baseline clinical characteristics are presented in the Table. Seven of the CML-CP patients achieved MCyR, including 6 complete responses. One CML-CP patient achieved a minimal cytogenetic response and 1 had no response. No CML-AP patient achieved MCyR. Time to onset of MCyR for the CML-CP patients were <3 months (n=2), 3 to <6 months (n=2), and 6 to <12 months (n=3). In the 7 patients with MCyR, duration of response to date is ≥6 to <12 (n=3), ≥12 to <18 (n=2), and ≥18 months (n=2); none lost response. Six CML-CP patients were in CHR at baseline and 3 achieved CHR within 3 months. One CML-AP patient achieved CHR at <3 months and 1 only had hematologic improvement. Eight of the 9 CML-CP patients and 1 CML-AP patient remained in CHR at time of analysis, whereas 1 CML-CP patient lost response in ≥6 to <12 months (patient had minimal cytogenetic response). At the last recorded cycle, the number of dosing days for CML-CP patients ranged from 1–12 days and 7–15 days in CML-AP patients; number of days of treatment delay ranged from 0–4 days in CML-CP patients and 0–33 days in the 2 CML-AP patients. All patients had at least 1 AE and 1 serious AE. The most common AEs were anemia (11/11), thrombocytopenia (9/11), neutropenia (6/11), nausea (7/11), diarrhea or fatigue (5/11 each), and headache (4/11). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 10 (91%) patients. The most common were hematologic: thrombocytopenia (79% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(79\) \end{document} CML-CP, 100% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(22\) \end{document} CML-AP), anemia (67% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(49\) \end{document} CML-CP, 100% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(22\) \end{document} CML-AP), and neutropenia (56% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(59\) \end{document} CML-CP, 0% \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(02\) \end{document} CML-AP). Leukopenia and pancytopenia were reported in 1 patient each in the CML-AP group. Blast crisis, which was deemed treatment-related, was reported in 1 patient in the CML-AP group; this patient was discontinued. No deaths were reported. Conclusions A subset of heavily pretreated patients with CP or AP CML who participated in phase 2 studies of omacetaxine were able to continue omacetaxine for up to 53 cycles and experience durable major cytogenetic and hematologic responses. Grade 3/4 AEs were primarily hematologic and consistent with the known safety profile of omacetaxine. Disclosures: Kantarjian: ChemGenex (Teva): Research Funding. Off Label Use: Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is a protein synthesis inhibitor that does not depend on direct binding of Bcr-Abl. Omacetaxine has shown clinical activity in 2 studies of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), one in patients with a history of the T315I Bcr-Abl mutation and the other in patients failing at least 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Baccarani:Teva: Research Funding. Nicolini:BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Speakers Bureau. Wetzler:Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding. Akard:Merck: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Eisai: Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Legros:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Craig:Teva: Consultancy. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Chemgenex (Teva): Consultancy, Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".