MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979725663 · doi:10.15173/glj.v10i3.4117

In Memoriam: Dan Clawson (1948-2019)

2019· article· en· W2979725663 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ruth Milkman

Notice bibliographique

RevueGlobal Labour Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLabor Movements and Unions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

of a heart attack.He was a prolific labour sociologist, and a brilliant, tireless organiser with an unwavering commitment to social justice.He came of age in the late 1960s and was indelibly marked by the New Left.Dedication to participatory democracy, feminism and progressive politics permeated his scholarship, his activism, as well as his personal conduct over the years.He had truly extraordinary leadership abilities, and yet was utterly unpretentious -a rare soul who never craved personal recognition.Dan had a habit of creating new organisations, even if he was reluctant to take credit for doing so.He was a founding member of the American Sociological Association's section on Labor and Labor Movements, which he went on to chair in 2004-2005.Earlier, he had helped to create Scholars, Artists and Writers for Social Justice, a group whose mission was to strengthen ties between intellectuals and the labour movement; he served as its national chair in 1998-1999.He also was a founder of the Public Higher Education Network of Massachusetts and of a progressive caucus in the Massachusetts teachers' union.Dan had wide-ranging intellectual interests and published a rich body of rigorous, first-class scholarship.The research questions he chose to pursue were not narrow ones of interest only to specialists; instead he consistently aimed to illuminate critical political and social issues.He is best known for his extensive research on labour, especially his books Bureaucracy and the Labor Process (1980) and The Next Upsurge (2003).But there was much more.He was an early analyst of what we now call "money in politics", co-authoring Money Talks (1992), a study of corporate Political Action Committees, and Dollars and Votes (1998).More recently he wrote about the transformation of higher education, especially the growth of contingent faculty, including a co-authored book, The Future of Higher Education (2011).He also contributed to scholarship on work-family issues, coauthoring a pathbreaking book, Unequal Time (2014), one of the few studies in this field that seriously engages class inequality (as well as gender) and the role of labour unions.He published many articles on all these topics as well, in both academic journals and more popular outlets.Dan did more than his share of editorial work, most notably serving as editor of Contemporary Sociology from 1995 to 1997, as co-editor of the Rose book series from 2000 to 2005, and editing or coediting three books.Dan spent his entire academic career at one institution, to the great good fortune of his colleagues and students at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.There he was not only a pillar of the Sociology Department but also a stalwart supporter of the campus' vibrant Labor Center, which he helped rescue more than once from the ever-threatening administrative axe.The Center's website features a brief remembrance saying that when the next crisis comes, they'll start by asking "WWDD: What would Dan do

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,872
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGlobal Labour JournalMême sujetLabor Movements and UnionsTravaux en français237 207