Bibliographic record
Abstract
of a heart attack.He was a prolific labour sociologist, and a brilliant, tireless organiser with an unwavering commitment to social justice.He came of age in the late 1960s and was indelibly marked by the New Left.Dedication to participatory democracy, feminism and progressive politics permeated his scholarship, his activism, as well as his personal conduct over the years.He had truly extraordinary leadership abilities, and yet was utterly unpretentious -a rare soul who never craved personal recognition.Dan had a habit of creating new organisations, even if he was reluctant to take credit for doing so.He was a founding member of the American Sociological Association's section on Labor and Labor Movements, which he went on to chair in 2004-2005.Earlier, he had helped to create Scholars, Artists and Writers for Social Justice, a group whose mission was to strengthen ties between intellectuals and the labour movement; he served as its national chair in 1998-1999.He also was a founder of the Public Higher Education Network of Massachusetts and of a progressive caucus in the Massachusetts teachers' union.Dan had wide-ranging intellectual interests and published a rich body of rigorous, first-class scholarship.The research questions he chose to pursue were not narrow ones of interest only to specialists; instead he consistently aimed to illuminate critical political and social issues.He is best known for his extensive research on labour, especially his books Bureaucracy and the Labor Process (1980) and The Next Upsurge (2003).But there was much more.He was an early analyst of what we now call "money in politics", co-authoring Money Talks (1992), a study of corporate Political Action Committees, and Dollars and Votes (1998).More recently he wrote about the transformation of higher education, especially the growth of contingent faculty, including a co-authored book, The Future of Higher Education (2011).He also contributed to scholarship on work-family issues, coauthoring a pathbreaking book, Unequal Time (2014), one of the few studies in this field that seriously engages class inequality (as well as gender) and the role of labour unions.He published many articles on all these topics as well, in both academic journals and more popular outlets.Dan did more than his share of editorial work, most notably serving as editor of Contemporary Sociology from 1995 to 1997, as co-editor of the Rose book series from 2000 to 2005, and editing or coediting three books.Dan spent his entire academic career at one institution, to the great good fortune of his colleagues and students at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.There he was not only a pillar of the Sociology Department but also a stalwart supporter of the campus' vibrant Labor Center, which he helped rescue more than once from the ever-threatening administrative axe.The Center's website features a brief remembrance saying that when the next crisis comes, they'll start by asking "WWDD: What would Dan do
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".