MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979748361 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.825.825

Phase 1b/2 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Sonidegib (LDE225) in Combination with Ruxolitinib (INC424) in Patients with Myelofibrosis

2015· article· en· W2979748361 sur OpenAlexaff
Vikas Gupta, Claire Harrison, Hans Carl Hasselbalch, Lisa Pieri, Steffen Koschmieder, Francisco Cervantes, Weichao Bao, Stacey Kalambakas, Edric Atienza, Prashanth Gopalakrishna, Florian H. Heidel

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRuxolitinibMedicineMyelofibrosisInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchJanus kinase inhibitorOncologyGastroenterologySurgeryBone marrowToxicityJanus kinase

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of disease-related splenomegaly or symptoms in adults with primary myelofibrosis (MF), post-polycythemia vera (PPV) MF, and post-essential thrombocythemia (PET) MF. In a murine model of MF, ruxolitinib in combination with the hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI) sonidegib, improved splenomegaly and bone marrow (BM) fibrosis more than ruxolitinib monotherapy (Bhagwat, ASH 2013). Building on these data, ruxolitinib and sonidegib combination therapy is being assessed in a phase 1b/2 study in patients (pts) with MF (NCT01787552). Findings from the phase 1b portion of this study determined the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) to be sonidegib 400 mg once daily and ruxolitinib 20 mg twice daily (Gupta, ASH 2014). Combination treatment was generally well tolerated; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and the only observed dose-limiting toxicity was creatine kinase (CK) elevation. In this report, safety and efficacy data from the analysis performed 24 weeks after the last pt enrollment (data cutoff, 08 May 2015) are presented for pts treated at the RP2D. Methods: Eligible pts includedadults with primary or secondary (PPV or PET) intermediate (Int)- or high-risk MF with palpable splenomegaly who were not previously treated with a JAK inhibitor or HPI. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of co-administration of ruxolitinib and sonidegib determined by reduction in spleen volume per MRI/CT by central review at the end of weeks 24 and 48. Results: Overall, 27 pts with primary MF (n = 16; 59.3%), PET-MF (n = 7; 25.9%), and PPV-MF (n = 4; 14.8%) were treated at the RP2D (median exposure, 28.6 weeks). The median age was 69 years (range, 44 to 83 years), 70.4% of pts were male, and 85.2% were JAK2 V617F positive. According to the International Prognosis Scoring System, 1 pt (3.7%) was low risk, 4 pts (14.8%) were Int-1, 4 pts (14.8%) were Int-2, and 18 pts (66.7%) were high risk. At data cutoff, 20 pts (74.1%) remained on treatment; 5 pts discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (AE), and 1 pt each due to pt decision and death (multi-organ failure unrelated to study treatment occurring 2 days after discontinuation). Overall, the most common AEs regardless of causality (all grade; grade 3/4; Table) were anemia (52%; 33%) and muscle spasms (48%; 4%). AEs requiring dose adjustment or interruption were experienced by 17 pts (63%), with the most common being increased CK (19% [n = 5]) and myalgia (19% [n = 5]). The mean hemoglobin level at baseline (BL) was ≈ 100 g/L and it remained relatively stable throughout treatment. Mean platelet count decreased from BL levels of ≈ 300 × 109/L to ≈ 150 × 109/L by week 4, and then remained relatively stable at ≈ 200 × 109/L. At the end of week 24, 12 pts (44.4%) had a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume as measured by MRI/CT and 15 pts (55.6%) achieved a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at any time on treatment (Figure 1). A ≥ 50% reduction in palpable spleen length was achieved by 15 pts (55.6%) at the end of week 24; a best response of ≥ 50% reduction in spleen length at any time on treatment was achieved by 25 pts (92.6%), with 15 pts (55.6%) having a non-palpable spleen (Figure 2). The mean change in JAK2 V617F allele burden was -9.0% (range, -56.5% to 7.0%) from BL to the end of week 24. Investigator-assessed changes in BM fibrosis in pts with BL and post-BL values indicated that 2 pts had an improvement (from grade 3 to grade 2), 8 pts remained stable, and 3 pts had a worsening from BL by the end of week 24. Pharmacokinetics of the combination will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of ruxolitinib and sonidegib has activity in pts with MF and may provide improved benefit over ruxolitinib monotherapy. Combination treatment was generally well tolerated, with ≈ 74% of pts remaining on treatment at data cutoff. Table. Most Common Adverse Events Sonidegib 400 mg Once Daily + Ruxolitinib 20 mg Twice Daily(n = 27) AEs of any cause in ≥ 10% of pts, n (%) All Grade 3/4 Anemia 14 (52) 9 (33) Muscle spasms 13 (48) 1 (4) Increased CK 10 (37) 5 (19) Myalgia 8 (30) 2 (7) Dysgeusia 8 (30) - Thrombocytopenia 7 (26) 3 (11) Diarrhea 7 (26) 1 (4) Fatigue 7 (26) 0 Pyrexia 6 (22) 1 (4) Alopecia 6 (22) - Constipation 5 (19) 0 Nausea 5 (19) 0 Abdominal pain 4 (15) 0 Dizziness 4 (15) 0 Headache 4 (15) 0 Decreased platelet count 3 (11) 1 (4) Asthenia 3 (11) 0 Cough 3 (11) 0 Decreased weight 3 (11) 0 Dry mouth 3 (11) 0 Dyspnea 3 (11) 0 Extremity pain 3 (11) 0 Increased creatinine 3 (11) 0 Disclosures Gupta: Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Ruxolitinib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for treatment of patients with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Sonidegib is approved for the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma. Harrison:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hasselbalch:Novartis: Research Funding. Koschmieder:Novartis Foundation: Research Funding; Baxalta/CTI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel reimbursement for scientific conferences ; Janssen Cilag: Other: Travel reimbursement for scientific conferences ; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel reimbursement for scientific conferences , Research Funding. Cervantes:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CTI-Baxter: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy. Bao:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Kalambakas:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Atienza:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Gopalakrishna:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Heidel:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations32
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207