MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979752621 · doi:10.1182/blood.v114.22.2363.2363

Fludarabine (F) and Rituximab (R) (FR) as Initial Therapy for Symptomatic Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL): Population-Based Experience Matches Clinical Trials.

2009· article· en· W2979752621 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Alina S. Gerrie, Cynthia L. Toze, Khaled M. A. Ramadan, Charles Li, Adrian Yee, Joseph M. Connors

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensBC Cancer AgencySt. Paul's HospitalLeukemia & Lymphoma Society of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineFludarabineInternal medicineRituximabChronic lymphocytic leukemiaPopulationCyclophosphamideGastroenterologyOncologySurgeryLymphomaLeukemiaChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2363 Poster Board II-340 Background: Clinical trials report that FR as initial therapy in symptomatic CLL produces an overall response rate of 90% and significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared retrospectively to F alone [Byrd Blood 2003, 2005] and that FCR (F, cyclophosphamide and R) improves response rates and PFS compared to FC alone [Hallek ASH 2008]. FR has been the standard initial therapy for CLL/SLL in British Columbia (BC) (population = 4.2 × 106) since 2004. We wished to determine if, in an unselected community based population, the same results could be achieved with FR therapy as those seen in highly selected clinical trial populations. Patients and Methods: The BC Cancer Agency (BCCA) Lymphoid Cancer Database was searched to identify pts who received FR as initial therapy for CLL/SLL as per BCCA guidelines (F 40mg/m2/day orally D1-5 or 25mg/m2/day IV D1-5 [adjusted for renal function] and R 375mg/m2 IV D1, q 28 days for 4-8 cycles). Pts were excluded if they had more than one hematologic malignancy (n=2). OS was calculated from date of FR to date of death or last follow-up. Treatment-free survival (TFS) was calculated from date of FR to date of next treatment or death from toxicity. Factors present at initiation of treatment were analyzed for impact on outcomes. Results: 98 pts were identified who received FR from 2004-2009 as initial therapy for CLL (83%) or SLL (17%). Median age at FR was 62 y (range, 42 – 86 y). 36% had Rai stage 3 or 4 and 13% had ECOG performance status 2-3. Median lymphocyte count was 30 × 109/L (range 0.6-282 × 109/L) and LDH was elevated in 34% (29/86 with available levels). Nearly half of all pts tested were positive for CD38 (34 of 69 pts, 49%) and ZAP 70 expression (10 of 22 pts, 45%). FISH was performed in 35 pts: 13q deletion, 21 (60%); 11q deletion, 5 (14%); 17p deletion, 10 (29%); trisomy 12, 11 (31%). Most pts (65%) were observed prior to FR for a median of 28 months (range, 3 – 172 mos). Common indications for treatment included symptomatic lymphadenopathy (n=36), cytopenias (n=28), fatigue (n=23), and constitutional symptoms (n=19). Pts underwent a median of 6 cycles of FR (range, 1-8). Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 13 pts (13%) (cytopenias, 5; febrile neutropenia, 3; infection, 2; pulmonary disease, 1; ITP, 1; AIHA, 1) and due to progression in 4 pts (4%). Hospitalization during therapy was required in 13 pts (13%) (febrile neutropenia, 5; documented infection, 2; elective splenectomy, 2; pulmonary disease, 2; ITP, 1; rituximab administration, 1). At a median follow up of living pts of 2.4 y, 31 pts (32%) have received additional therapy after FR including CVP in 11 pts (+R, 8); chlorambucil, 7 (+ R, 1; +prednisone, 1); FR, 5; cyclophosphamide, 5 (+prednisone, 3; +vincristine, 1); CHOP, 3 (+R, 2). At time of analysis (June 2009), 86 pts were alive; 14 died, 12 from progressive CLL and 2 from toxicity of FR (severe infection, 1; interstitial lung disease, 1). For the entire 98 pts, the 2 and 4 y OS were 90% and 72%, respectively (median not reached); 2 and 4 y TFS were 69% and 54%, respectively (median 4.0 y). Factors at treatment contributing to OS in univariate analysis included elevated LDH (P=0.004), Hb <110 g/L (P=0.03), and the presence of deletion 17p by FISH (P=0.04) or CD38 expression (>15% of CD19+ cells) by immunophenotyping (P=0.04). TFS was significantly worse in those with Hb <110 g/L (P=0.003), Rai stage 3-4 (P=0.008) or lymphocyte count >150 × 109/L (P=0.0013) while cytogenetic abnormalities and immunophenotyping had no effect on TFS. Age ≥ 60 y (n=60) or age ≥ 70 y (n=26) had no effect on either OS or TFS. Conclusions: In this non-selected community based population of pts with CLL/SLL, including many over 60 y (61%) and 70 y (27%) of age, our results show that initial treatment with FR leads to excellent OS and TFS, consistent with clinical trial results: 2 y OS, this study 90%; FR Byrd [Blood 2005] 93%; FCR Hallek [ASH 2008] 91%; 2 y TFS, this study 69%; FR Byrd, 2 y PFS 67%; FCR Hallek 2 y PFS 77%. FR can be safely and successfully given to community based pts, irrespective of age, for first-line therapy for CLL/SLL with OS and TFS similar to that achieved in clinical trial settings. Disclosures: Connors: Roche Canada: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,063

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,113
Tête enseignante GPT0,430
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207