MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fludarabine (F) and Rituximab (R) (FR) as Initial Therapy for Symptomatic Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL): Population-Based Experience Matches Clinical Trials.

2009· article· en· W2979752621 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alina S. Gerrie, Cynthia L. Toze, Khaled M. A. Ramadan, Charles Li, Adrian Yee, Joseph M. Connors

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencySt. Paul's HospitalLeukemia & Lymphoma Society of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFludarabineInternal medicineRituximabChronic lymphocytic leukemiaPopulationCyclophosphamideGastroenterologyOncologySurgeryLymphomaLeukemiaChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2363 Poster Board II-340 Background: Clinical trials report that FR as initial therapy in symptomatic CLL produces an overall response rate of 90% and significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared retrospectively to F alone [Byrd Blood 2003, 2005] and that FCR (F, cyclophosphamide and R) improves response rates and PFS compared to FC alone [Hallek ASH 2008]. FR has been the standard initial therapy for CLL/SLL in British Columbia (BC) (population = 4.2 × 106) since 2004. We wished to determine if, in an unselected community based population, the same results could be achieved with FR therapy as those seen in highly selected clinical trial populations. Patients and Methods: The BC Cancer Agency (BCCA) Lymphoid Cancer Database was searched to identify pts who received FR as initial therapy for CLL/SLL as per BCCA guidelines (F 40mg/m2/day orally D1-5 or 25mg/m2/day IV D1-5 [adjusted for renal function] and R 375mg/m2 IV D1, q 28 days for 4-8 cycles). Pts were excluded if they had more than one hematologic malignancy (n=2). OS was calculated from date of FR to date of death or last follow-up. Treatment-free survival (TFS) was calculated from date of FR to date of next treatment or death from toxicity. Factors present at initiation of treatment were analyzed for impact on outcomes. Results: 98 pts were identified who received FR from 2004-2009 as initial therapy for CLL (83%) or SLL (17%). Median age at FR was 62 y (range, 42 – 86 y). 36% had Rai stage 3 or 4 and 13% had ECOG performance status 2-3. Median lymphocyte count was 30 × 109/L (range 0.6-282 × 109/L) and LDH was elevated in 34% (29/86 with available levels). Nearly half of all pts tested were positive for CD38 (34 of 69 pts, 49%) and ZAP 70 expression (10 of 22 pts, 45%). FISH was performed in 35 pts: 13q deletion, 21 (60%); 11q deletion, 5 (14%); 17p deletion, 10 (29%); trisomy 12, 11 (31%). Most pts (65%) were observed prior to FR for a median of 28 months (range, 3 – 172 mos). Common indications for treatment included symptomatic lymphadenopathy (n=36), cytopenias (n=28), fatigue (n=23), and constitutional symptoms (n=19). Pts underwent a median of 6 cycles of FR (range, 1-8). Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 13 pts (13%) (cytopenias, 5; febrile neutropenia, 3; infection, 2; pulmonary disease, 1; ITP, 1; AIHA, 1) and due to progression in 4 pts (4%). Hospitalization during therapy was required in 13 pts (13%) (febrile neutropenia, 5; documented infection, 2; elective splenectomy, 2; pulmonary disease, 2; ITP, 1; rituximab administration, 1). At a median follow up of living pts of 2.4 y, 31 pts (32%) have received additional therapy after FR including CVP in 11 pts (+R, 8); chlorambucil, 7 (+ R, 1; +prednisone, 1); FR, 5; cyclophosphamide, 5 (+prednisone, 3; +vincristine, 1); CHOP, 3 (+R, 2). At time of analysis (June 2009), 86 pts were alive; 14 died, 12 from progressive CLL and 2 from toxicity of FR (severe infection, 1; interstitial lung disease, 1). For the entire 98 pts, the 2 and 4 y OS were 90% and 72%, respectively (median not reached); 2 and 4 y TFS were 69% and 54%, respectively (median 4.0 y). Factors at treatment contributing to OS in univariate analysis included elevated LDH (P=0.004), Hb <110 g/L (P=0.03), and the presence of deletion 17p by FISH (P=0.04) or CD38 expression (>15% of CD19+ cells) by immunophenotyping (P=0.04). TFS was significantly worse in those with Hb <110 g/L (P=0.003), Rai stage 3-4 (P=0.008) or lymphocyte count >150 × 109/L (P=0.0013) while cytogenetic abnormalities and immunophenotyping had no effect on TFS. Age ≥ 60 y (n=60) or age ≥ 70 y (n=26) had no effect on either OS or TFS. Conclusions: In this non-selected community based population of pts with CLL/SLL, including many over 60 y (61%) and 70 y (27%) of age, our results show that initial treatment with FR leads to excellent OS and TFS, consistent with clinical trial results: 2 y OS, this study 90%; FR Byrd [Blood 2005] 93%; FCR Hallek [ASH 2008] 91%; 2 y TFS, this study 69%; FR Byrd, 2 y PFS 67%; FCR Hallek 2 y PFS 77%. FR can be safely and successfully given to community based pts, irrespective of age, for first-line therapy for CLL/SLL with OS and TFS similar to that achieved in clinical trial settings. Disclosures: Connors: Roche Canada: Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207