MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2980092244 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.2245.2245

Safety and Efficacy of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Remobilization with Plerixafor (Mozobil®) + G-CSF In Pediatric Patients with Malignant Disorders

2010· article· en· W2980092244 sur OpenAlexaff
Shalini Shenoy, Barbara L. Asselin, Jignesh Dalal, Rakesh K. Goyal, Jonathan L. Kaufman, David M. Loeb, John M. McCarty, Kent A. Robertson, Caron Strahlendorf, Mark C. Walters, Jennifer Angell, Dirk Huebner, Peter J. Shaw

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensBC Children's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlerixaforMedicineApheresisGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorCXCR4 antagonistCD34Hematopoietic stem cell transplantationChemotherapyCXCR4TransplantationSurgeryOncologyInternal medicineStem cellBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2245 Background: High dose chemo/radiotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (HSCT) is indicated in several pediatric malignant disorders such as neuroblastoma and relapsed Hodgkin's disease. Ideally, 2–5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg should be infused during autologous peripheral blood (PB) HSCT to support timely and durable engraftment and improve transplant outcomes. In patients who have received repetitive cycles of intensive chemotherapy, this target is not always achieved with standard mobilization regimens. Plerixafor, a novel CXCR4 antagonist, when combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), can safely and predictably mobilize adequate numbers of CD34+ HSC to support transplantation in adult patients with myeloma and lymphoma. We report on the safety and efficacy of PB HSC mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF in pediatric patients with cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all children with various malignant disorders who were enrolled in the US plerixafor compassionate use program (CUP; NCT00291811). Patients who had previously failed HSC mobilization (defined as the inability to collect ≥2 x106 CD34+ cells/kg or achieve an adequate PB CD34+ cell count, typically ≥10 CD34+ cells/μl) with growth factor +/− chemotherapy were treated with plerixafor + G-CSF. The goal was to collect ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for autologous HSCT. G-CSF (10μg/kg SC) was administered daily for 5 days. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) was given in the evening on Day 4, ~11 hours prior to apheresis. Plerixafor, G-CSF and apheresis were repeated daily until ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg had been collected. Results: A total of 16 patients with non Hodgkin's lymphoma (3), Hodgkin's disease (1), CNS tumors (4), Ewing's sarcoma (4), neuroblastoma (2), osteogenic sarcoma (1) and desmoplastic small cell tumor (1) underwent the procedure. The median age was 14 years and 7 (44%) patients were male. In previous mobilization attempts, 5 patients failed to collect the minimum transplantable cell dose with a median yield of 0.44 x106 (range: 0.17–2.2 × 106) CD34+ cells/kg. Apheresis was never attempted in11 patients due to low PB CD34+ cell levels; median cells/μl was 1.0 (range, 0.01–12) in 9 patients with available data. Initial mobilization regimens included growth factor alone in 6 patients and growth factor + chemotherapy in 9 patients (data unavailable for 1 patient). When re-challenged for mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF, 14 (88%) patients successfully collected ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg; this included all 4 (100%) patients with lymphoma and 10 (83%) patients with solid tumors. The median time to collect the target cell dose was 1.5 days (range 1–5 days). The median CD34+ cell yield from all patients was 3.5 × 106 cells/kg (range 0.96 – 9.80 × 106); patients with lymphoma and solid tumors collected a median of 7.2 (range 3.2 – 7.9) × 106 and 3.3 (range 0.96 –9.8) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. Eleven (69%) patients proceeded to transplant including all 4 (100%) patients with lymphoma and 7 (58%) patients with solid tumors. One patient with neuroblastoma received a tandem transplant. The median infused cell dose was 4.18 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.7 – 7.6 × 106). The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 14 and 33 days, respectively. Plerixafor-related adverse events were mostly mild, and observed in 5 (31%) patients. They included administration site reactions (4), vomiting (2), nausea (1) and oral paraesthesia (1). No patient experienced a serious adverse event. Conclusions: Treatment with plerixafor + G-CSF safely and effectively mobilized HSC in the majority of pediatric patients with malignant disorders after failure of standard mobilization with growth factor ± chemotherapy. Successful stem cell mobilization allowed consideration of autologous HSCT when indicated. Mobilization with plerixafor was safe and resulted in prompt engraftment. Many of these patients could not have proceeded to transplant without this intervention. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Plerixafor (Mozobil®), a hematopoietic stem cell mobilizer, is approved by the US FDA in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells to the peripheral blood for collection and subsequent autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma. McCarty: Genzyme, Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Angell: Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huebner: Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207