MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Safety and Efficacy of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Remobilization with Plerixafor (Mozobil®) + G-CSF In Pediatric Patients with Malignant Disorders

2010· article· en· W2980092244 on OpenAlexaff
Shalini Shenoy, Barbara L. Asselin, Jignesh Dalal, Rakesh K. Goyal, Jonathan L. Kaufman, David M. Loeb, John M. McCarty, Kent A. Robertson, Caron Strahlendorf, Mark C. Walters, Jennifer Angell, Dirk Huebner, Peter J. Shaw

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlerixaforMedicineApheresisGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorCXCR4 antagonistCD34Hematopoietic stem cell transplantationChemotherapyCXCR4TransplantationSurgeryOncologyInternal medicineStem cellBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2245 Background: High dose chemo/radiotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (HSCT) is indicated in several pediatric malignant disorders such as neuroblastoma and relapsed Hodgkin's disease. Ideally, 2–5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg should be infused during autologous peripheral blood (PB) HSCT to support timely and durable engraftment and improve transplant outcomes. In patients who have received repetitive cycles of intensive chemotherapy, this target is not always achieved with standard mobilization regimens. Plerixafor, a novel CXCR4 antagonist, when combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), can safely and predictably mobilize adequate numbers of CD34+ HSC to support transplantation in adult patients with myeloma and lymphoma. We report on the safety and efficacy of PB HSC mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF in pediatric patients with cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all children with various malignant disorders who were enrolled in the US plerixafor compassionate use program (CUP; NCT00291811). Patients who had previously failed HSC mobilization (defined as the inability to collect ≥2 x106 CD34+ cells/kg or achieve an adequate PB CD34+ cell count, typically ≥10 CD34+ cells/μl) with growth factor +/− chemotherapy were treated with plerixafor + G-CSF. The goal was to collect ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for autologous HSCT. G-CSF (10μg/kg SC) was administered daily for 5 days. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) was given in the evening on Day 4, ~11 hours prior to apheresis. Plerixafor, G-CSF and apheresis were repeated daily until ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg had been collected. Results: A total of 16 patients with non Hodgkin's lymphoma (3), Hodgkin's disease (1), CNS tumors (4), Ewing's sarcoma (4), neuroblastoma (2), osteogenic sarcoma (1) and desmoplastic small cell tumor (1) underwent the procedure. The median age was 14 years and 7 (44%) patients were male. In previous mobilization attempts, 5 patients failed to collect the minimum transplantable cell dose with a median yield of 0.44 x106 (range: 0.17–2.2 × 106) CD34+ cells/kg. Apheresis was never attempted in11 patients due to low PB CD34+ cell levels; median cells/μl was 1.0 (range, 0.01–12) in 9 patients with available data. Initial mobilization regimens included growth factor alone in 6 patients and growth factor + chemotherapy in 9 patients (data unavailable for 1 patient). When re-challenged for mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF, 14 (88%) patients successfully collected ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg; this included all 4 (100%) patients with lymphoma and 10 (83%) patients with solid tumors. The median time to collect the target cell dose was 1.5 days (range 1–5 days). The median CD34+ cell yield from all patients was 3.5 × 106 cells/kg (range 0.96 – 9.80 × 106); patients with lymphoma and solid tumors collected a median of 7.2 (range 3.2 – 7.9) × 106 and 3.3 (range 0.96 –9.8) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. Eleven (69%) patients proceeded to transplant including all 4 (100%) patients with lymphoma and 7 (58%) patients with solid tumors. One patient with neuroblastoma received a tandem transplant. The median infused cell dose was 4.18 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.7 – 7.6 × 106). The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 14 and 33 days, respectively. Plerixafor-related adverse events were mostly mild, and observed in 5 (31%) patients. They included administration site reactions (4), vomiting (2), nausea (1) and oral paraesthesia (1). No patient experienced a serious adverse event. Conclusions: Treatment with plerixafor + G-CSF safely and effectively mobilized HSC in the majority of pediatric patients with malignant disorders after failure of standard mobilization with growth factor ± chemotherapy. Successful stem cell mobilization allowed consideration of autologous HSCT when indicated. Mobilization with plerixafor was safe and resulted in prompt engraftment. Many of these patients could not have proceeded to transplant without this intervention. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Plerixafor (Mozobil®), a hematopoietic stem cell mobilizer, is approved by the US FDA in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells to the peripheral blood for collection and subsequent autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma. McCarty: Genzyme, Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Angell: Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huebner: Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207