MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2980316438 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.56.56

A Phase I Study of the Anti-CD79b Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) DCDS4501A Targeting CD79b in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

2012· article· en· W2980316438 sur OpenAlexaff
Maria Corinna Palanca-Wessels, Ian W. Flinn, Laurie H. Sehn, Manish R. Patel, Randeep Sangha, Myron S. Czuczman, Gilles Salles, Franck Morschhauser, Ranjana H. Advani, Oliver W. Press, William Ho, Robert S. Kahn, Dan Lü, Zheng Su, Yu‐Waye Chu, Sarit Assouline

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Établissements canadiensJewish General HospitalBC Cancer Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTolerabilityInternal medicineRituximabLymphomaOncologyFollicular lymphomaDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaRadioimmunotherapyAntibody-drug conjugateGastroenterologyAdverse effectAntibodyImmunologyMonoclonal antibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 56 Introduction: CD79b, a component of the B-cell receptor (BCR), is expressed by nearly all B-cell malignancies including NHL. DCDS4501A is an ADC consisting of an anti-CD79b monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a microtubule disrupting agent via a protease-cleavable peptide linker. DCDS4501A exhibits potent anti-tumor activity in murine xenograft models of B-cell lymphoma. Methods: A Phase I study of DCDS4501A is being conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and biologic activity of escalating doses of DCDS4501A in pts with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL. Pts receive DCDS4501A intravenously every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Intrapatient dose escalation based on tolerability at higher doses is permitted. Following determination of the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) based on protocol-defined dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring within 21 days of dosing, additional pts with indolent and aggressive B-cell NHL will be enrolled to further evaluate safety and efficacy based on Cheson response criteria. Here we report the RP2D and preliminary safety and efficacy results. Results: To date, 33 pts have been enrolled (64% male), median age of 65 years (range 20–85): follicular lymphoma (FL, n=14), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=11), MCL (n=4), MZL (n=2), transformed FL (n=1), and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL, n=1). Enrolled patients were heavily pre-treated: 29 patients had ≥ 3 prior regimens, all pts had received prior rituximab, and 9 pts received prior high-dose therapy followed by stem cell transplantation. Pts received a median of 3 doses (range 1–12) of DCDS4501A in 6 dose-escalation cohorts with doses ranging from 0.1–2.4 mg/kg. The protocol-specified MTD was not formally reached, however, 2.4 mg/kg DCDS4501A was determined to be the RP2D based on the overall safety and tolerability profile at that dose, which included 1 pt with a DLT of Grade 4 febrile neutropenia and pneumonia. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) occurring in ≥ 20% of pts were neutropenia (59%), diarrhea (38%), nausea (34%), hyperglycemia (31%), fatigue (31%), constipation (28%), peripheral neuropathy (28%), pyrexia (28%), leukopenia (25%), chills (22%), and cough (22%). Neutropenia (39%) and leukopenia (12%) were the only treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 AEs in ≥ 10% of pts. Seven of 12 pts treated at the RP2D of 2.4 mg/kg experienced a Grade 3–4 AE: Grade 3–4 neutropenia in 5 pts, and anemia, leukopenia and fatigue each in 2 pts. Eight (24%) pts across all dose levels experienced a serious AE (SAE). Four SAEs were reported in 2 pts treated at the RP2D of 2.4 mg/kg: 1 pt with atrial fibrillation, neutropenia, and pneumonia and 1 pt with cardiac failure; in both cases the SAE resolved and study treatment resumed. Treatment discontinuation due to AE occurred in 1 pt each for Grade 3 neutropenia and Grade 3 hyponatremia. One pt had a dose reduction for Grade 4 febrile neutropenia and pneumonia. No deaths were reported within 30 days of the last dose of DCDS4501A. Most cases of neutropenia were observed in the absence of growth factor support. Assessment of Cycle 1 PK after the first dose of DCDS4501A indicated that exposure of antibody-conjugated MMAE (acMMAE), total antibody, and free MMAE, increased with dose. The clearance estimates of acMMAE and total antibody were similar across doses from 0.1–2.4 mg/kg; volume of distribution estimates of acMMAE and total antibody approximated plasma volume, which also did not change with dose. These results suggested dose proportional increase of acMMAE and total antibody exposures. Early evidence of anti-tumor activity was observed, including 5 pts with > 50% reduction in target lesion burden at the first on-treatment tumor assessment after 3–4 cycles of treatment: 2 with FL, and 1 each with DLBCL, transformed FL, and MCL; 4 pts continue on treatment with DCDS4501A (range 5–12 cycles). Two of four pts treated at 2.4 mg/kg evaluable for anti-tumor activity to date had > 80% reduction in target lesion burden at the first on-treatment tumor assessment. Conclusions: DCDS4501A, a novel ADC targeting CD79b, has demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL. Updated clinical data will be presented. These results support additional clinical evaluation of DCDS4501A in B-cell malignancies. Disclosures: Palanca-Wessels: Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: anti-CD79b Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) DCDS4501A. Salles:roche: Consultancy. Morschhauser:Genentech: Honoraria. Advani:Genentech: Research Funding. Press:g: Consultancy. Ho:Genentech: Employment. Kahn:Genentech: Employment. Lu:Genentech: Employment. Su:Genentech: Employment. Chu:Genentech: Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,333
Écart entre enseignants0,310 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchTravaux en français237 207