Decolonizing the Concrete Wave: Visual Sovereignty in Native American Skateboarding Culture
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis focuses primarily on skateboard deck graphics and the cultural and political implications of skateboarding within the context of settler colonialism in the contemporary United States. It examines the intersection of skateboard deck graphics, appropriation, and the expression of Native American visual and geographical sovereignties. In the past decade, three important art exhibitions have highlighted the innovative ways in which Native American artists and skaters are combining art and skateboarding. These exhibitions were Remix: New Modernities in a Post-Indian World, curated by the staff at the National Museum of the American Indian in New York, Ramp it Up: Skateboard Culture in Native America, which ran from December 2009 until June 2010, also at the National Museum of the American Indian in New York, and Beat Nation: Art, Hip Hop and Aboriginal Culture, which opened at Vancouver Art Gallery in 2012. Artworks included in each of these exhibitions drew direct connections between skateboarding and Native American visual sovereignty. \nCompared to other topics in art historical scholarship, careful studies of the visual and cultural aspects of skateboarding, and of skateboarding’s connection to Native American visual sovereignty, are relatively rare. Scholarly studies of skateboarding do exist, but their focus typically is not art historical, but rather medical, architectural, or sociological in scope. Iain Borden’s monograph, Skateboarding, Space and the City: Architecture and the Body, as well as scholarship by Becky Beal and Lisa Wiedman, interrogates contemporary constructions of the urban environment and authenticity in American skateboarding subculture, respectively. My thesis draws upon this scholarship, and incorporates the concept of visual sovereignty from the field of Native American art history. This concecpt, visual sovereignty, was first articulated in 1995 by Tuscarora artist and scholar Jolene Rickard to describe the intersection of political and geographical sovereignties and representations of Native peoples. I apply this concept to my own research in order to discuss the history of skateboarding, beginning with the Indigenous Polynesian origins of surfing, and the political and cultural valences of skateboarding within the context of contemporary settler colonialism in the United States. The issues, conflicts, and controversies surrounding land use and ownership in North American are always influenced by the history of settler colonialism: the entirety of the North American continent is by rights Indigenous land, and ongoing issues of political and geographical sovereignty are freighted with the history of genocide and dispossession that are the mechanisms of settler colonialism. These issues remain both relevant and urgent, and yet these issues are not thoroughly addressed in the current scholarship on skateboarding in the United States or in art historical discussions of skateboard deck graphics. \nIn this thesis, I argue that the cultural and artistic practices surrounding skateboarding – specifically the design of skateboard deck graphics by contemporary Native American artists, the creation of skate parks on reservation land, and the support of skateboarding among Native American youth by organizations such as The Stronghold Society – both expresses visual sovereignty and enacts land-based sovereignty within the context of North American settler colonialism.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».