MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980520950

Decolonizing the Concrete Wave: Visual Sovereignty in Native American Skateboarding Culture

2017· article· en· W2980520950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clarissa Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAdventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSovereigntyVisual cultureHistoryPolitical scienceSociologyAnthropologyLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis focuses primarily on skateboard deck graphics and the cultural and political implications of skateboarding within the context of settler colonialism in the contemporary United States. It examines the intersection of skateboard deck graphics, appropriation, and the expression of Native American visual and geographical sovereignties. In the past decade, three important art exhibitions have highlighted the innovative ways in which Native American artists and skaters are combining art and skateboarding. These exhibitions were Remix: New Modernities in a Post-Indian World, curated by the staff at the National Museum of the American Indian in New York, Ramp it Up: Skateboard Culture in Native America, which ran from December 2009 until June 2010, also at the National Museum of the American Indian in New York, and Beat Nation: Art, Hip Hop and Aboriginal Culture, which opened at Vancouver Art Gallery in 2012. Artworks included in each of these exhibitions drew direct connections between skateboarding and Native American visual sovereignty. 
\nCompared to other topics in art historical scholarship, careful studies of the visual and cultural aspects of skateboarding, and of skateboarding’s connection to Native American visual sovereignty, are relatively rare. Scholarly studies of skateboarding do exist, but their focus typically is not art historical, but rather medical, architectural, or sociological in scope. Iain Borden’s monograph, Skateboarding, Space and the City: Architecture and the Body, as well as scholarship by Becky Beal and Lisa Wiedman, interrogates contemporary constructions of the urban environment and authenticity in American skateboarding subculture, respectively. My thesis draws upon this scholarship, and incorporates the concept of visual sovereignty from the field of Native American art history. This concecpt, visual sovereignty, was first articulated in 1995 by Tuscarora artist and scholar Jolene Rickard to describe the intersection of political and geographical sovereignties and representations of Native peoples. I apply this concept to my own research in order to discuss the history of skateboarding, beginning with the Indigenous Polynesian origins of surfing, and the political and cultural valences of skateboarding within the context of contemporary settler colonialism in the United States. The issues, conflicts, and controversies surrounding land use and ownership in North American are always influenced by the history of settler colonialism: the entirety of the North American continent is by rights Indigenous land, and ongoing issues of political and geographical sovereignty are freighted with the history of genocide and dispossession that are the mechanisms of settler colonialism. These issues remain both relevant and urgent, and yet these issues are not thoroughly addressed in the current scholarship on skateboarding in the United States or in art historical discussions of skateboard deck graphics. 
\nIn this thesis, I argue that the cultural and artistic practices surrounding skateboarding – specifically the design of skateboard deck graphics by contemporary Native American artists, the creation of skate parks on reservation land, and the support of skateboarding among Native American youth by organizations such as The Stronghold Society – both expresses visual sovereignty and enacts land-based sovereignty within the context of North American settler colonialism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma)Same topicAdventure Sports and Sensation SeekingFrench-language works237,207