MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2980543393 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.2609.2609

Disease Characteristics and Prognostic Implications Of Cell Surface FLT3 Receptor (CD135) Expression In Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia – A Report From Children’s Oncology Group

2013· article· en· W2980543393 sur OpenAlexaff
Katherine Tarlock, Todd A. Alonzo, Michael R. Loken, Robert B. Gerbing, Richard Aplenc, Lillian Sung, Susana C. Raimondi, Betsy Hirsch, Samir B. Kahwash, Amy Heerema‐McKenney, Alan S. Gamis, Soheil Meshinchi

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOncologyMyeloid leukemiaMedicinePopulationInternal medicineLeukemiaCancer researchImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract FLT3 is a highly expressed cell surface receptor in a majority of acute leukemias with near universal expression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High FLT3 expression level in conjunction with 11q23/MLL-rearrangement has been associated with poor prognosis in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is considered a potential therapeutic target through FLT3 inhibition. In vitro studies have demonstrated enhanced sensitivity of ALL and AML cells with high FLT3 expression to the cytotoxic effects of FLT3 inhibition. Although the clinical impact of high allelic ratio FLT3/ITD has been demonstrated in AML, the significance of FLT3 expression in those without the mutation has not been well studied, and all previous studies have been limited to evaluation of FLT3 transcript levels for correlation with outcome. Here we present the results of a prospective evaluation of FLT3 cell surface protein expression (CD135) on the diagnostic leukemic blast population as determined by multi-dimensional flow cytometry (MDF) in specimens from patients treated on COG AAML0531. Of the 495 patients enrolled after September 25, 2008, 366 patients enrolled on the accompanying biology study and had diagnostic specimens for evaluation of central CD135 expression by MDF. All diagnostic specimens underwent central MDF analysis for CD135 expression. FLT3 mutation data was available on all 366 patients, 57 patients were FLT3/ITD (15.6%), 21 were FLT3/ALM (5.7%) and the remaining 290 were FLT3wild type (FLT3/WT). There was significant variability of CD135 expression across the population with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ranging from 3-232 (median 18). Median CD135 expression for those with FLT3/ITD, FLT3/ALM, FLT3/WT was 22 vs. 19 vs. 17 respectively (p=NS). Patients were divided into quartiles based on CD135 expression and clinical characteristics and outcome were correlated with CD135 expression across the four quartiles. There was not a significant difference in CD135 expression by age, gender, race, or ethnicity across the four quartiles. Those with high CD135 expression (Q4) had similar median diagnostic WBC counts as those with lower CD135 (Q1-3), although median diagnostic blast % in those in Q4 was significantly elevated (p=0.003). Nearly half of those in Q4 were FAB M5 compared to 13% in Q1-3 (p<0.001) and all those with FAB M7 had low CD135 expression (p=0.004). Evaluation of the diagnostic cytogenetics and CD135 expression demonstrated significant correlation of CD135 expression with MLL translocations, as 22% of patients in Q4 had MLLtranslocations vs. 11% in Q1-3 (p=0.005). This was primarily driven by patients with t(9;11), p=0.001. There was an inverse correlation between inv(16) and CD135 expression as only 2% of those in Q4 had inv(16) compared to 15% in Q1-3 (p<0.001). CD135 was then correlated with response to induction and post-induction outcome. Complete remission (CR) rate was comparable between those with high or lower CD135 expression (p=0.76). Those with high or lower CD135 expression had similar 3-yr overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of 70% and 66% respectively (p=0.9) and relapse risk from CR of 42% and 36% respectively (p=0.35). Given the known prognostic and therapeutic significance of FLT3/ITD, we evaluated any prognostic implications of FLT3 expression in patients without FLT3/ITD, most of whom lack other cytogenetic risk features. Similar to the entire cohort, in the FLT3/ITD-negative cohort CD135 expression correlated with FAB M5 (p<0.001), t(9;11), (p<0.001) and inversely correlated with inv(16), p=0.001. 3-yr OS for those in Q4 was 71% vs. 67% in Q1-3 (p=0.955). Given the association of MLL and CD135 expression, we evaluated the association of CD135 expression with outcome in patients with MLLtranslocations (N=73); in these patients the 3-yr event free survival (EFS) was similar between those with high or lower CD135 expression (p=0.621). In summary, we found that CD135 surface expression did not correlate with FLT3 mutations or clinical outcomes. Although FLT3 expression in FLT3/ITD-negative patients does not appear to offer additional prognostic information with current therapy, it may provide a therapeutic target in a subset of high expressing patients. This study also demonstrates that elevated FLT3 expression is associated with MLL rearrangements and warrants further study in this population with regards to potential prognostic and therapeutic implications. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→