Disease Characteristics and Prognostic Implications Of Cell Surface FLT3 Receptor (CD135) Expression In Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia – A Report From Children’s Oncology Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract FLT3 is a highly expressed cell surface receptor in a majority of acute leukemias with near universal expression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High FLT3 expression level in conjunction with 11q23/MLL-rearrangement has been associated with poor prognosis in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is considered a potential therapeutic target through FLT3 inhibition. In vitro studies have demonstrated enhanced sensitivity of ALL and AML cells with high FLT3 expression to the cytotoxic effects of FLT3 inhibition. Although the clinical impact of high allelic ratio FLT3/ITD has been demonstrated in AML, the significance of FLT3 expression in those without the mutation has not been well studied, and all previous studies have been limited to evaluation of FLT3 transcript levels for correlation with outcome. Here we present the results of a prospective evaluation of FLT3 cell surface protein expression (CD135) on the diagnostic leukemic blast population as determined by multi-dimensional flow cytometry (MDF) in specimens from patients treated on COG AAML0531. Of the 495 patients enrolled after September 25, 2008, 366 patients enrolled on the accompanying biology study and had diagnostic specimens for evaluation of central CD135 expression by MDF. All diagnostic specimens underwent central MDF analysis for CD135 expression. FLT3 mutation data was available on all 366 patients, 57 patients were FLT3/ITD (15.6%), 21 were FLT3/ALM (5.7%) and the remaining 290 were FLT3wild type (FLT3/WT). There was significant variability of CD135 expression across the population with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ranging from 3-232 (median 18). Median CD135 expression for those with FLT3/ITD, FLT3/ALM, FLT3/WT was 22 vs. 19 vs. 17 respectively (p=NS). Patients were divided into quartiles based on CD135 expression and clinical characteristics and outcome were correlated with CD135 expression across the four quartiles. There was not a significant difference in CD135 expression by age, gender, race, or ethnicity across the four quartiles. Those with high CD135 expression (Q4) had similar median diagnostic WBC counts as those with lower CD135 (Q1-3), although median diagnostic blast % in those in Q4 was significantly elevated (p=0.003). Nearly half of those in Q4 were FAB M5 compared to 13% in Q1-3 (p<0.001) and all those with FAB M7 had low CD135 expression (p=0.004). Evaluation of the diagnostic cytogenetics and CD135 expression demonstrated significant correlation of CD135 expression with MLL translocations, as 22% of patients in Q4 had MLLtranslocations vs. 11% in Q1-3 (p=0.005). This was primarily driven by patients with t(9;11), p=0.001. There was an inverse correlation between inv(16) and CD135 expression as only 2% of those in Q4 had inv(16) compared to 15% in Q1-3 (p<0.001). CD135 was then correlated with response to induction and post-induction outcome. Complete remission (CR) rate was comparable between those with high or lower CD135 expression (p=0.76). Those with high or lower CD135 expression had similar 3-yr overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of 70% and 66% respectively (p=0.9) and relapse risk from CR of 42% and 36% respectively (p=0.35). Given the known prognostic and therapeutic significance of FLT3/ITD, we evaluated any prognostic implications of FLT3 expression in patients without FLT3/ITD, most of whom lack other cytogenetic risk features. Similar to the entire cohort, in the FLT3/ITD-negative cohort CD135 expression correlated with FAB M5 (p<0.001), t(9;11), (p<0.001) and inversely correlated with inv(16), p=0.001. 3-yr OS for those in Q4 was 71% vs. 67% in Q1-3 (p=0.955). Given the association of MLL and CD135 expression, we evaluated the association of CD135 expression with outcome in patients with MLLtranslocations (N=73); in these patients the 3-yr event free survival (EFS) was similar between those with high or lower CD135 expression (p=0.621). In summary, we found that CD135 surface expression did not correlate with FLT3 mutations or clinical outcomes. Although FLT3 expression in FLT3/ITD-negative patients does not appear to offer additional prognostic information with current therapy, it may provide a therapeutic target in a subset of high expressing patients. This study also demonstrates that elevated FLT3 expression is associated with MLL rearrangements and warrants further study in this population with regards to potential prognostic and therapeutic implications. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".