MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2980975062 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-112337

Excellence in PNH in Canada (EPIC): A Single Centre Pilot Project Evaluating Disease Trajectory for PNH Patients Receiving Eculizumab

2018· article· en· W2980975062 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Michael James Vernon, Kevin H.M. Kuo, Rebecca Leroux, Christopher J. Patriquin

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueComplement system in diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEculizumabParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaMedicinePediatricsInternal medicineHemoglobinuriaAnemiaImmunologyComplement system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare disease caused by mutations that impair formation of GPI anchors. Absence of GPI-linked molecules CD55 and CD59 renders blood cells sensitive to complement-mediated damage. The classic presentation includes intravascular hemolysis, thrombophilia, and marrow failure. Other symptoms, such as fatigue, dysphagia, and abdominal pain may also occur. Eculizumab inhibits complement protein C5 and has drastically improved outcomes in PNH. Despite greater awareness of PNH since eculizumab's approval, it remains a rare disease and patients may go years without a diagnosis. To investigate this, we reviewed our centre's experience to identify areas that could be improved upon. Methods: A retrospective review was completed of PNH patients followed at our centre over the last 5 years. Data was collected via chart review and interviews. Information collected included age of symptom onset, time from symptoms to assessment, hematology referral, diagnosis, and to start of therapy. Laboratory investigations were also recorded. Patients with small clones (<10%) were excluded as they would not qualify for eculizumab. Results: Nine patients were enrolled (6 male, 3 female). Table 1 summarizes their presenting features. For reference, the same categories are presented for Canadian patients in the International PNH Registry. Figure 1 shows symptom progression from onset, diagnosis, and start of therapy. Average age at symptom onset was 38.2±20.5 years. Cytopenia was the most common presentation (78%). Dark urine occurred in 88%. Three patients (33%) reported fatigue as their first symptom. One, with aplastic anemia (AA) and treated with immunosuppression, developed abdominal pain and dark urine 7 years later and was found to have PNH despite negative initial testing. Table 2 summarizes individual patient timelines for diagnosis and treatment. Average time from initial symptom to medical assessment was 2.7±6.6 years, though 7 (78%) presented within several weeks. One did not present until 20 years after anemia and jaundice occurred, as she was asymptomatic. Another patient waited 4 years before assessment because he occasionally experienced dark urine with exertion and attributed this to exercise. Median duration from presentation to diagnosis was 3 years (range: 0.05-30); however, 3 (33%) patients were diagnosed within one month. One was diagnosed when he presented with worsening anemia one year after initial presentation. Another presented in 1975 with renal dysfunction, underwent extensive evaluation, but not diagnosed with PNH for 30 years. Dark urine with anemia prompted evaluation in 79%. Three reported abdominal pain, 22% jaundice, 22% dysphagia, 11% dyspnea, and 67% were fatigued. Only one patient in our cohort developed thromboembolism (11%), compared to 19% of Canadians in the International PNH Registry. This patient was anemic and jaundiced for many years but only after developing hepatic vein thrombosis was she was evaluated for PNH. Patients saw a median of 4 health care providers (HCP) (range: 2-8) before diagnosis. Six saw general practitioners (GP) and emergency physicians before hematology and 3 saw other specialists first. One saw dermatology for a rash not initially realized to be thrombocytopenic petechiae. He was then referred to hematology after developing severe anemia as well. One saw several nephrologists for dark urine; he was diagnosed with glomerulonephritis, and this was not re-evaluated for 20 years. One saw urology and gastroenterology before hematology referral. Two were worked up for PNH after their GPs retired and were reviewed by new ones. Eight patients (89%) are currently on eculizumab. One does not meet funding criteria. The average time between diagnosis and initiation of therapy was 1.3±1.7 years. Conclusion: PNH is rare and can present in heterogeneous ways. Outside hematology, HCPs may rarely encounter patients, if ever. Time interval between onset of symptoms to formal diagnosis in our cohort had the greatest duration and variation. Once diagnosed, all patients in our cohort were initiated on therapy quite rapidly save for one who had a nine-year delay between diagnosis and availability of eculizumab in Canada. The greatest delay in this cohort was the time from symptom onset to diagnosis, suggesting that a focus on increasing awareness of PNH may be the area where most efforts should be placed. Disclosures Patriquin: Octapharma: Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support and is site investigator for clinical trials with the company; Ra Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,609
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,823

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,232 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetComplement system in diseasesTravaux en français237 207