MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980975062 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-112337

Excellence in PNH in Canada (EPIC): A Single Centre Pilot Project Evaluating Disease Trajectory for PNH Patients Receiving Eculizumab

2018· article· en· W2980975062 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael James Vernon, Kevin H.M. Kuo, Rebecca Leroux, Christopher J. Patriquin

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEculizumabParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaMedicinePediatricsInternal medicineHemoglobinuriaAnemiaImmunologyComplement system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare disease caused by mutations that impair formation of GPI anchors. Absence of GPI-linked molecules CD55 and CD59 renders blood cells sensitive to complement-mediated damage. The classic presentation includes intravascular hemolysis, thrombophilia, and marrow failure. Other symptoms, such as fatigue, dysphagia, and abdominal pain may also occur. Eculizumab inhibits complement protein C5 and has drastically improved outcomes in PNH. Despite greater awareness of PNH since eculizumab's approval, it remains a rare disease and patients may go years without a diagnosis. To investigate this, we reviewed our centre's experience to identify areas that could be improved upon. Methods: A retrospective review was completed of PNH patients followed at our centre over the last 5 years. Data was collected via chart review and interviews. Information collected included age of symptom onset, time from symptoms to assessment, hematology referral, diagnosis, and to start of therapy. Laboratory investigations were also recorded. Patients with small clones (<10%) were excluded as they would not qualify for eculizumab. Results: Nine patients were enrolled (6 male, 3 female). Table 1 summarizes their presenting features. For reference, the same categories are presented for Canadian patients in the International PNH Registry. Figure 1 shows symptom progression from onset, diagnosis, and start of therapy. Average age at symptom onset was 38.2±20.5 years. Cytopenia was the most common presentation (78%). Dark urine occurred in 88%. Three patients (33%) reported fatigue as their first symptom. One, with aplastic anemia (AA) and treated with immunosuppression, developed abdominal pain and dark urine 7 years later and was found to have PNH despite negative initial testing. Table 2 summarizes individual patient timelines for diagnosis and treatment. Average time from initial symptom to medical assessment was 2.7±6.6 years, though 7 (78%) presented within several weeks. One did not present until 20 years after anemia and jaundice occurred, as she was asymptomatic. Another patient waited 4 years before assessment because he occasionally experienced dark urine with exertion and attributed this to exercise. Median duration from presentation to diagnosis was 3 years (range: 0.05-30); however, 3 (33%) patients were diagnosed within one month. One was diagnosed when he presented with worsening anemia one year after initial presentation. Another presented in 1975 with renal dysfunction, underwent extensive evaluation, but not diagnosed with PNH for 30 years. Dark urine with anemia prompted evaluation in 79%. Three reported abdominal pain, 22% jaundice, 22% dysphagia, 11% dyspnea, and 67% were fatigued. Only one patient in our cohort developed thromboembolism (11%), compared to 19% of Canadians in the International PNH Registry. This patient was anemic and jaundiced for many years but only after developing hepatic vein thrombosis was she was evaluated for PNH. Patients saw a median of 4 health care providers (HCP) (range: 2-8) before diagnosis. Six saw general practitioners (GP) and emergency physicians before hematology and 3 saw other specialists first. One saw dermatology for a rash not initially realized to be thrombocytopenic petechiae. He was then referred to hematology after developing severe anemia as well. One saw several nephrologists for dark urine; he was diagnosed with glomerulonephritis, and this was not re-evaluated for 20 years. One saw urology and gastroenterology before hematology referral. Two were worked up for PNH after their GPs retired and were reviewed by new ones. Eight patients (89%) are currently on eculizumab. One does not meet funding criteria. The average time between diagnosis and initiation of therapy was 1.3±1.7 years. Conclusion: PNH is rare and can present in heterogeneous ways. Outside hematology, HCPs may rarely encounter patients, if ever. Time interval between onset of symptoms to formal diagnosis in our cohort had the greatest duration and variation. Once diagnosed, all patients in our cohort were initiated on therapy quite rapidly save for one who had a nine-year delay between diagnosis and availability of eculizumab in Canada. The greatest delay in this cohort was the time from symptom onset to diagnosis, suggesting that a focus on increasing awareness of PNH may be the area where most efforts should be placed. Disclosures Patriquin: Octapharma: Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support and is site investigator for clinical trials with the company; Ra Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207