MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2981701776 · doi:10.1353/gpr.2019.0029

The Prairie Populist: George Hara Williams and the Untold Story of the CCF by J. F. Conway

2019· article· en· W2981701776 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian Gribben

Notice bibliographique

RevueGreat Plains research · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeorge (robot)PoliticsBiographyClassicsStrategistCommonwealthNothingHistoryArt historySociologyPhilosophyLawManagementArchaeologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Prairie Populist: George Hara Williams and the Untold Story of the CCF by J. F. Conway Brian Gribben The Prairie Populist: George Hara Williams and the Untold Story of the CCF. By J. F. Conway. Regina: University of Regina Press, 2018. xi + 324 pp. Illustrations, notes, bibliographic notes, bibliography, index. C$34.95, US$29.95 paper. A much-needed addition to the history of the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), John Conway's political biography of George Hara Williams reestablishes him as a consequential man of the left. Though Conway frequently displays a mastery of the economic and political landscape of interwar Canada in the text, Conway's strength lies in his analysis of information derived from an unpublished manuscript by Williams's daughter, Muriel Wiens, and Friedrich Steininger's master's thesis on Williams and its application in reinterpreting relevant literature and archival materials. The resulting essay reveals both Williams's pivotal role as a strategist, organizer, and leader of the CCF during its embryonic stages as well as the interparty factionalism and personality conflicts that occurred within the party. Conway begins his essay by outlining Williams's early life before delving into his transition into a dedicated socialist. Conway notes there is nothing to indicate that Williams's formative years spent in Manitoba, though punctuated by his family's financial struggles, would orient him toward either farming or radical politics, let alone both. After serving in the First World War, Williams homesteaded near Wadena, Saskatchewan, and became active in the Farmers' Union of Canada. Conway frames Williams's evolution as a socialist against a broader examination of the Prairie provinces' socioeconomic and political milieu, providing the reader with a recurrent micro/macro perspective. I found this technique, though contextually useful, sometimes distracting, as were Conway's excessive use of acronyms when referring to the myriad of organizations introduced. The bulk of Conway's work is devoted to Williams's efforts in unifying divergent labor, farmer, and socialist movements into a vibrant left wing political force that could compete with a complacent Liberal Party in both the provinces and Ottawa, the subsequent formation of the CCF, and Williams's ascendancy to its provincial and national leadership. Williams's skill as a strategist and organizer in fending off challenges from the Social Credit Party and, by his unyielding commitment of the CCF to socialism, in providing a real alternative to the Liberal Party accentuate Conway's central argument that Williams was indispensable to the CCF's survival and emergence as a viable political party. Conway concludes his study by examining Williams's demise after falling out with other party leaders over the CCF's war policies, his reputation's marginalization by peers following his premature death in 1945, and George Williams's place in Anglo-Canadian history. Conway's nuanced depiction of his subject, while not softening Williams's radicalism, highlights the pragmatism and selflessness that made him an effective organizer. Further, when tracing the CCF through its early electoral disappointments to its emergence as a provincial power, though clearly establishing the CCF's political success as a uniquely Saskatchewan phenomenon, Conway locates the cultural and political barriers it overcame within the wider Northern Plains. Particularly, Conway's description of the numerous leftist and reformist movements competing for farmers' support were characteristic of other Depression-era farmer insurgencies in eastern Montana and the Dakotas, as were the pervasive anticommunist sentiments that often stymied their effectiveness. The Prairie Populist adds greatly to our understanding of the CCF and affirms George Williams's place among its most important figures. Though eight decades separate Williams's Great Plains from the present, the farmer's maxim of "go big or go broke" remains an unfortunate reality for many engaged in agriculture. Perhaps Williams's outreach to those unfamiliar with, or inherently suspicious of, progressive policies and his navigation of reactionary responses can provide an example to present activists. [End Page 173] Brian Gribben Coordinator, Government Documents, Archives, and Special Collections, Forsyth Library Fort Hays State University Copyright © 2019 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,446
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,006
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGreat Plains researchMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207