MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981701776 · doi:10.1353/gpr.2019.0029

The Prairie Populist: George Hara Williams and the Untold Story of the CCF by J. F. Conway

2019· article· en· W2981701776 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian Gribben

Bibliographic record

VenueGreat Plains research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)PoliticsBiographyClassicsStrategistCommonwealthNothingHistoryArt historySociologyPhilosophyLawManagementArchaeologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Prairie Populist: George Hara Williams and the Untold Story of the CCF by J. F. Conway Brian Gribben The Prairie Populist: George Hara Williams and the Untold Story of the CCF. By J. F. Conway. Regina: University of Regina Press, 2018. xi + 324 pp. Illustrations, notes, bibliographic notes, bibliography, index. C$34.95, US$29.95 paper. A much-needed addition to the history of the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), John Conway's political biography of George Hara Williams reestablishes him as a consequential man of the left. Though Conway frequently displays a mastery of the economic and political landscape of interwar Canada in the text, Conway's strength lies in his analysis of information derived from an unpublished manuscript by Williams's daughter, Muriel Wiens, and Friedrich Steininger's master's thesis on Williams and its application in reinterpreting relevant literature and archival materials. The resulting essay reveals both Williams's pivotal role as a strategist, organizer, and leader of the CCF during its embryonic stages as well as the interparty factionalism and personality conflicts that occurred within the party. Conway begins his essay by outlining Williams's early life before delving into his transition into a dedicated socialist. Conway notes there is nothing to indicate that Williams's formative years spent in Manitoba, though punctuated by his family's financial struggles, would orient him toward either farming or radical politics, let alone both. After serving in the First World War, Williams homesteaded near Wadena, Saskatchewan, and became active in the Farmers' Union of Canada. Conway frames Williams's evolution as a socialist against a broader examination of the Prairie provinces' socioeconomic and political milieu, providing the reader with a recurrent micro/macro perspective. I found this technique, though contextually useful, sometimes distracting, as were Conway's excessive use of acronyms when referring to the myriad of organizations introduced. The bulk of Conway's work is devoted to Williams's efforts in unifying divergent labor, farmer, and socialist movements into a vibrant left wing political force that could compete with a complacent Liberal Party in both the provinces and Ottawa, the subsequent formation of the CCF, and Williams's ascendancy to its provincial and national leadership. Williams's skill as a strategist and organizer in fending off challenges from the Social Credit Party and, by his unyielding commitment of the CCF to socialism, in providing a real alternative to the Liberal Party accentuate Conway's central argument that Williams was indispensable to the CCF's survival and emergence as a viable political party. Conway concludes his study by examining Williams's demise after falling out with other party leaders over the CCF's war policies, his reputation's marginalization by peers following his premature death in 1945, and George Williams's place in Anglo-Canadian history. Conway's nuanced depiction of his subject, while not softening Williams's radicalism, highlights the pragmatism and selflessness that made him an effective organizer. Further, when tracing the CCF through its early electoral disappointments to its emergence as a provincial power, though clearly establishing the CCF's political success as a uniquely Saskatchewan phenomenon, Conway locates the cultural and political barriers it overcame within the wider Northern Plains. Particularly, Conway's description of the numerous leftist and reformist movements competing for farmers' support were characteristic of other Depression-era farmer insurgencies in eastern Montana and the Dakotas, as were the pervasive anticommunist sentiments that often stymied their effectiveness. The Prairie Populist adds greatly to our understanding of the CCF and affirms George Williams's place among its most important figures. Though eight decades separate Williams's Great Plains from the present, the farmer's maxim of "go big or go broke" remains an unfortunate reality for many engaged in agriculture. Perhaps Williams's outreach to those unfamiliar with, or inherently suspicious of, progressive policies and his navigation of reactionary responses can provide an example to present activists. [End Page 173] Brian Gribben Coordinator, Government Documents, Archives, and Special Collections, Forsyth Library Fort Hays State University Copyright © 2019 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreat Plains researchSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207