Holocene Fault Scarps and Shallow Magnetic Anomalies Along the Southern Whidbey Island Fault Zone Near Woodinville, Washington
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The southern Whidbey Island fault zone (SWIFZ), as previously mapped using borehole data, potential-field anomalies, and marine seismic-reflection surveys, consists of four subparallel, northwest-trending fault strands, extending ~100 km from near Vancouver Island to the Washington mainland. The vertical component of displacement changes both across and along the fault, and strike slip motion may be important as well. Abrupt uplift at a coastal marsh on south-central Whidbey Island suggests that the SWIFZ experienced a MW 6.5 7.0 earthquake between 3200 and 2800 years B.P. The SWIFZ has been hypothesized to extend southeastward beneath the mainland, making landfall between the cities of Seattle and Everett. Linear, lowamplitude aeromagnetic anomalies in this mainland region are on strike with the SWIFZ and may facilitate mapping the SWIFZ onshore. The most prominent of the residual aeromagnetic anomalies, the Cottage Lake aeromagnetic lineament, extends at least 16 km, lies approximately on strike with the SWIFZ on Whidbey Island, and passes within about 27 km of downtown Everett. Glacial deposits are slightly magnetic in this region, as indicated by magnetic susceptibility measurements and a ground-magnetic survey, and, in places, the Cottage Lake aeromagnetic lineament is associated with topographic lineaments. Spectral analysis and modeling experiments indicate that the source of the Cottage Lake aeromagnetic lineament extends to depths greater than 2 km and into Eocene sedimentary strata. Subtle scarps on Pleistocene surfaces are visible on high-resolution lidar topography at a number of locations in the mainland region, often closely associated with aeromagnetic lineaments. In the field, scarps exhibit northeast-side-up vertical relief of 1 to 5 m. One group of scarps extends a total distance of 18 km along the Cottage Lake aeromagnetic lineament, where they defines two strands: One strand lies east of Crystal Lake and is referred to here as the Crystal Lake lidar lineament, another strand follows the Little Bear Creek drainage and is called here the Little Bear Creek lidar lineament. Four excavations across these two lidar lineaments show evidence for multiple folding and faulting events since deglaciation, most likely above buried reverse/oblique faults. One trench exposed a normal fault, although it was not possible to determine whether slip was caused by glacial or tectonic processes. In this same trench, evidence for younger folding suggests that surface deformation during an earthquake formed the scarp seen on lidar maps near Crystal Lake. Subsequent scarp degradation buried a forest soil, from which charcoal samples indicated that the folding event occurred after 11,670 years B.P. Two trenches were also excavated along the Little Bear Creak lineament near Grace, Washington. One of these trenches showed evidence for multiple events, including both folding and faulting, with the youngest event disturbing late Holocene wetland soils. In total, paleoseismological evidence suggests that the SWIFZ produced at four events since deglaciation about 16,400 years ago, the most recent after 2.7 ka. Liquefaction features near Everett indicate that strong shaking has occurred there at least three times in the last 1100 years, although evidence that those earthquakes occurred on the SWIFZ has not yet been found.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».