MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982226858

Holocene Fault Scarps and Shallow Magnetic Anomalies Along the Southern Whidbey Island Fault Zone Near Woodinville, Washington

2005· article· en· W2982226858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian L. Sherrod, Richard J. Blakely, C. S. Weaver, Harvey M. Kelsey, Elizabeth A. Barnett, Ray E. Wells

Bibliographic record

VenueAGU Fall Meeting Abstracts · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLineamentGeologyFault scarpSeismologyFault (geology)Magnetic anomalyAeromagnetic surveyLavaGeophysicsTectonicsVolcano
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The southern Whidbey Island fault zone (SWIFZ), as previously mapped using borehole data, potential-field anomalies, and marine seismic-reflection surveys, consists of four subparallel, northwest-trending fault strands, extending ~100 km from near Vancouver Island to the Washington mainland. The vertical component of displacement changes both across and along the fault, and strike slip motion may be important as well. Abrupt uplift at a coastal marsh on south-central Whidbey Island suggests that the SWIFZ experienced a MW 6.5 7.0 earthquake between 3200 and 2800 years B.P. The SWIFZ has been hypothesized to extend southeastward beneath the mainland, making landfall between the cities of Seattle and Everett. Linear, lowamplitude aeromagnetic anomalies in this mainland region are on strike with the SWIFZ and may facilitate mapping the SWIFZ onshore. The most prominent of the residual aeromagnetic anomalies, the Cottage Lake aeromagnetic lineament, extends at least 16 km, lies approximately on strike with the SWIFZ on Whidbey Island, and passes within about 27 km of downtown Everett. Glacial deposits are slightly magnetic in this region, as indicated by magnetic susceptibility measurements and a ground-magnetic survey, and, in places, the Cottage Lake aeromagnetic lineament is associated with topographic lineaments. Spectral analysis and modeling experiments indicate that the source of the Cottage Lake aeromagnetic lineament extends to depths greater than 2 km and into Eocene sedimentary strata. Subtle scarps on Pleistocene surfaces are visible on high-resolution lidar topography at a number of locations in the mainland region, often closely associated with aeromagnetic lineaments. In the field, scarps exhibit northeast-side-up vertical relief of 1 to 5 m. One group of scarps extends a total distance of 18 km along the Cottage Lake aeromagnetic lineament, where they defines two strands: One strand lies east of Crystal Lake and is referred to here as the Crystal Lake lidar lineament, another strand follows the Little Bear Creek drainage and is called here the Little Bear Creek lidar lineament. Four excavations across these two lidar lineaments show evidence for multiple folding and faulting events since deglaciation, most likely above buried reverse/oblique faults. One trench exposed a normal fault, although it was not possible to determine whether slip was caused by glacial or tectonic processes. In this same trench, evidence for younger folding suggests that surface deformation during an earthquake formed the scarp seen on lidar maps near Crystal Lake. Subsequent scarp degradation buried a forest soil, from which charcoal samples indicated that the folding event occurred after 11,670 years B.P. Two trenches were also excavated along the Little Bear Creak lineament near Grace, Washington. One of these trenches showed evidence for multiple events, including both folding and faulting, with the youngest event disturbing late Holocene wetland soils. In total, paleoseismological evidence suggests that the SWIFZ produced at four events since deglaciation about 16,400 years ago, the most recent after 2.7 ka. Liquefaction features near Everett indicate that strong shaking has occurred there at least three times in the last 1100 years, although evidence that those earthquakes occurred on the SWIFZ has not yet been found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAGU Fall Meeting AbstractsSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207