MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W298304909

Feminist Activism at a Canadian University

2010· article· en· W298304909 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Suzanne Staggenborg

Notice bibliographique

RevueResources for feminist research · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender Diversity and Inequality
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFeminismSociologyPublic relationsSocial movementGender studiesPolitical sciencePoliticsLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This paper examines the growth of feminism at McGill University and the creation of women's studies and a women's research centre, benefits for women faculty, staff and students, and changes in campus culture. The paper focuses on the activities of faculty and staff, while recognizing the importance of student activism as well. Opportunities for activism came from the larger women's movement and national organizations together with competitive pressures. Activists used the decentralized structure and interactional settings of the university to establish organizational habitats and achieve real changes despite strategic constraints and some fading of feminism over time. ********** Social movements arise within many organizations and institutions, including corporations, militaries, religions, government agencies, and universities (Davis et al., 2005; Katzenstein, 1998; Raeburn, 2004; Santoro and McGuire, 1997; Zald and Berger, 1978). Within universities, faculty, staff and students have organized to challenge sexist practices, advocate for employment and pay equity, institute day care centres and maternity leaves, and lobby for the creation of women's studies programs, research centres, and governing committees. Student feminist groups have challenged student governments, organized services for women, held educational events, and engaged in collective action, both on and off campus. Universities have helped to spawn and sustain feminist activities, and feminists have transformed universities in important ways. Nevertheless, feminists are often marginalized within universities and have difficulty maintaining institutional footholds. In this paper, 1 examine how activists attempted to implement feminist changes at McGill, showing both how they succeeded and how they were limited in their efforts. The paper focuses on the actions of faculty and staff, aided by students, who worked through the institutional structures of the university to create change. The protest activities of student groups are also important, and these activities are noted in my account, but a full treatment of student feminist groups is beyond the scope of the paper, given its focus on the more institutionalized forms of action often neglected in accounts of social movements. I begin by discussing theoretical ideas and findings about movements within institutions, including work on feminism within institutions. Next, I provide a brief history of feminist activity at McGill and several of its outcomes. (1) I then draw on this account to examine how the strategies of activists and the accomplishments and limitations of the movement result from external support and competitive pressures and internal organizational culture, structures and opportunities. Movements within Organizations and Institutions Movements within organizations and institutions are affected by both external forces and internal organizational dynamics. Widespread social and cultural changes, such as the influx of women into the work force and changes in acceptable language and interactions related to gender, together with changes in government policies, such as affirmative action and pay equity laws, raise consciousness among activists within organizations and help them to force changes in their institutions. Movements within institutions gain legitimacy when their goals are endorsed by other social institutions, governments, or large-scale social movements. The rise of a social movement outside of an institution increases the likelihood that an internal movement will also emerge because organizational participants are often affected by larger social movements and because organizations, whatever their intentions, are likely to recruit movement sympathizers at times when critical masses are influenced by the movement (Zald and Berger, 1978, p. 846). Movement activists within organizations often receive support from external organizations and movements, and they gain information and strategic advice from outsiders when they participate in other organizations. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,764
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,160
Tête enseignante GPT0,373
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2010
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResources for feminist researchMême sujetGender Diversity and InequalityTravaux en français237 207