MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W298304909

Feminist Activism at a Canadian University

2010· article· en· W298304909 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Suzanne Staggenborg

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismSociologyPublic relationsSocial movementGender studiesPolitical sciencePoliticsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the growth of feminism at McGill University and the creation of women's studies and a women's research centre, benefits for women faculty, staff and students, and changes in campus culture. The paper focuses on the activities of faculty and staff, while recognizing the importance of student activism as well. Opportunities for activism came from the larger women's movement and national organizations together with competitive pressures. Activists used the decentralized structure and interactional settings of the university to establish organizational habitats and achieve real changes despite strategic constraints and some fading of feminism over time. ********** Social movements arise within many organizations and institutions, including corporations, militaries, religions, government agencies, and universities (Davis et al., 2005; Katzenstein, 1998; Raeburn, 2004; Santoro and McGuire, 1997; Zald and Berger, 1978). Within universities, faculty, staff and students have organized to challenge sexist practices, advocate for employment and pay equity, institute day care centres and maternity leaves, and lobby for the creation of women's studies programs, research centres, and governing committees. Student feminist groups have challenged student governments, organized services for women, held educational events, and engaged in collective action, both on and off campus. Universities have helped to spawn and sustain feminist activities, and feminists have transformed universities in important ways. Nevertheless, feminists are often marginalized within universities and have difficulty maintaining institutional footholds. In this paper, 1 examine how activists attempted to implement feminist changes at McGill, showing both how they succeeded and how they were limited in their efforts. The paper focuses on the actions of faculty and staff, aided by students, who worked through the institutional structures of the university to create change. The protest activities of student groups are also important, and these activities are noted in my account, but a full treatment of student feminist groups is beyond the scope of the paper, given its focus on the more institutionalized forms of action often neglected in accounts of social movements. I begin by discussing theoretical ideas and findings about movements within institutions, including work on feminism within institutions. Next, I provide a brief history of feminist activity at McGill and several of its outcomes. (1) I then draw on this account to examine how the strategies of activists and the accomplishments and limitations of the movement result from external support and competitive pressures and internal organizational culture, structures and opportunities. Movements within Organizations and Institutions Movements within organizations and institutions are affected by both external forces and internal organizational dynamics. Widespread social and cultural changes, such as the influx of women into the work force and changes in acceptable language and interactions related to gender, together with changes in government policies, such as affirmative action and pay equity laws, raise consciousness among activists within organizations and help them to force changes in their institutions. Movements within institutions gain legitimacy when their goals are endorsed by other social institutions, governments, or large-scale social movements. The rise of a social movement outside of an institution increases the likelihood that an internal movement will also emerge because organizational participants are often affected by larger social movements and because organizations, whatever their intentions, are likely to recruit movement sympathizers at times when critical masses are influenced by the movement (Zald and Berger, 1978, p. 846). Movement activists within organizations often receive support from external organizations and movements, and they gain information and strategic advice from outsiders when they participate in other organizations. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0450.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources for feminist researchSame topicGender Diversity and InequalityFrench-language works237,207