MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2984163037 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-123449

Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Updated Results of a Phase Ib/II Randomized Study

2019· article· en· W2984163037 sur OpenAlexaff
Laurie H. Sehn, Matthew J. Matasar, Christopher R. Flowers, Manali Kamdar, Andrew McMillan, Mark Hertzberg, Sarit Assouline, Tae Min Kim, Won Seog Kim, Muhıt Özcan, Brandon Croft, Jamie Hirata, Ji Cheng, Grace Ku, Alex F. Herrera

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Établissements canadiensRoche (Canada)Jewish General HospitalSpinal Cord Injury BC
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBendamustineRituximabMedicineInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)Phases of clinical researchOncologyDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaLymphomaClinical trial

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Antibody-drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin (pola) targets CD79b on B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cytopenias and peripheral neuropathy (PN) are typical pola-associated adverse events (AEs). We reported significantly higher positron emission tomography-complete response (PET-CR) rates and improved duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with pola + bendamustine-rituximab (BR) vs BR in patients (pts) with R/R DLBCL (Sehn et al. ASH 2018). With an additional year of follow up, we report updated results for the Ph Ib/II DLBCL cohorts (NCT02257567). Methods: Methods were previously reported (Sehn et al. ASH 2018). Safety-evaluable population combined Ph Ib and randomized (RAN) Ph II pola + BR arms (N=45) vs RAN BR (N=39) arm. Longer-term safety outcomes for PN and second malignancies were evaluated. Efficacy reported separately for Ph Ib/II RAN DLBCL arms per investigator (INV) assessment. Additional outcomes including DOR for pts with confirmed responses (defined as having two consecutive responses) were assessed. Results: As of March 15 2019, median follow up for pts with R/R DLBCL in the Ph Ib (N=6) and Ph II RAN arms (N=80) was 46 and 30 months (mo), respectively. In the RAN Ph II (pola + BR [N=40]; BR [N=40]; 39 treated per arm), baseline characteristics were largely balanced with median 2 prior lines of therapy; 28% vs 30% of pts had 1 prior line, 28% vs 23% had 2, 45% vs 48% had ≥3 in the pola + BR vs BR arms, respectively. Most pts (75% vs 85%) were refractory to last prior treatment. PN events occurred in 40% (18/45) of pts treated with pola + BR (all grade [Gr] 1-2). At clinical cutoff, median time to PN resolution was approx. 8 days (range 0-69) with 56% (10/18) of pts experiencing complete resolution of PN. Eight pts had ongoing PN: 4 discontinued study early due to death from disease progression or AE (further follow up for PN resolution not possible), 3 had unresolved Gr 1 PN, and 1 had improving PN (max. Gr 1). Second malignancies occurred in 4% (2/45) of pts treated with pola + BR (1 prostate cancer; 1 squamous cell carcinoma and myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS]) and 5% (2/39) of pts in the BR arm (1 epiglottic carcinoma and MDS; 1 papillary thyroid cancer). In the Ph II RAN arms (pola + BR vs BR) updated median INV-assessed PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 7.5 (4.9, 17.0) vs 2.0 (1.5, 3.7) mo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; 95% CI 0.20, 0.56); median OS (95% CI) was 12.4 (9.0, 32.0) vs 4.7 (3.7, 8.3) mo (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.24, 0.71), respectively (Figure). Median time to first response was 2 mo (range 1.8-5.3). Median DOR (95% CI) for all responding pts in the pola + BR (N=28) vs BR (N=13) arms was 12.7 (5.8, 27.9) vs 4.1 (2.6, 12.7) mo (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.19, 0.91). Median DOR (95% CI) for confirmed responders in the pola + BR (N=19) vs BR (N=7) arms was 27.9 (10.3, NE) vs 12.7 (7.7, NE) mo (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.14, 1.32). Nearly half (47%, 9/19) of pts with confirmed responses to pola + BR remained event free at clinical cutoff with 8 pts in CR and 1 pt in partial response (downgraded from CR due to missing bone marrow biopsy based on modified Lugano Criteria). Of these 9 pts, 8 had DORs ranging from 22+ to 34+ mo (1 pt consolidated with allogeneic transplant) and 1 pt withdrew early from study after 14.5 mo of response. In the BR arm, 2 pts maintained responses without events; both had consolidative therapy (1 radiation, 1 allogeneic transplant). Baseline characteristics of pts with confirmed responses in the pola + BR arm are shown in the Table. In the Ph Ib cohort, 3/6 pts were confirmed responders: 1 pt progressed at 45 mo, 2 pts had ongoing responses of 29+ and 44+ mo, respectively. Conclusions: No new safety signals were identified with longer follow-up. PN events were low grade, manageable and mostly reversible. Adding pola to BR did not increase risk of second malignancies. While median time-to-event endpoints have not changed significantly since the last data cut, longer follow-up demonstrates notable durability of response in a proportion of pts treated with pola + BR, many of whom had refractory disease and received multiple lines of prior therapy. Pola + BR represents a promising new treatment for pts with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL. Disclosures Sehn: Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; TEVA Pharmaceuticals Industries: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; TEVA Pharmaceuticals Industries: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Ortho: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apobiologix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Ortho: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria. Matasar:Bayer: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Research Funding; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses , Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses , Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other. Flowers:BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Optimum Rx: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy. Kamdar:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. McMillan:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hertzberg:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Assouline:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Kim:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Donga: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; J + J: Research Funding. Ozcan:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Other: Travel, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Jazz: Other: Travel; Sanofi: Other: Travel; BMS: Other: Travel; MSD: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Abdi Ibrahim: Other: Travel; Janssen: Research Funding, Travel; Celgene: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Archigen: Research Funding. Croft:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Hirata:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Cheng:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Ku:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Herrera:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: GO29365 (pola + BR vs BR in relapsed/refractory DLBCL). Rituximab (Rituxan) is approved for use in relapsed/refractory low-grade NHL and in previously untreated DLBCL with CHOP, but is not approved for use in relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Bendamustine (Levact) is

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,304
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchTravaux en français237 207