MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984163037 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-123449

Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Updated Results of a Phase Ib/II Randomized Study

2019· article· en· W2984163037 on OpenAlexaff
Laurie H. Sehn, Matthew J. Matasar, Christopher R. Flowers, Manali Kamdar, Andrew McMillan, Mark Hertzberg, Sarit Assouline, Tae Min Kim, Won Seog Kim, Muhıt Özcan, Brandon Croft, Jamie Hirata, Ji Cheng, Grace Ku, Alex F. Herrera

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)Jewish General HospitalSpinal Cord Injury BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBendamustineRituximabMedicineInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)Phases of clinical researchOncologyDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaLymphomaClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Antibody-drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin (pola) targets CD79b on B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cytopenias and peripheral neuropathy (PN) are typical pola-associated adverse events (AEs). We reported significantly higher positron emission tomography-complete response (PET-CR) rates and improved duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with pola + bendamustine-rituximab (BR) vs BR in patients (pts) with R/R DLBCL (Sehn et al. ASH 2018). With an additional year of follow up, we report updated results for the Ph Ib/II DLBCL cohorts (NCT02257567). Methods: Methods were previously reported (Sehn et al. ASH 2018). Safety-evaluable population combined Ph Ib and randomized (RAN) Ph II pola + BR arms (N=45) vs RAN BR (N=39) arm. Longer-term safety outcomes for PN and second malignancies were evaluated. Efficacy reported separately for Ph Ib/II RAN DLBCL arms per investigator (INV) assessment. Additional outcomes including DOR for pts with confirmed responses (defined as having two consecutive responses) were assessed. Results: As of March 15 2019, median follow up for pts with R/R DLBCL in the Ph Ib (N=6) and Ph II RAN arms (N=80) was 46 and 30 months (mo), respectively. In the RAN Ph II (pola + BR [N=40]; BR [N=40]; 39 treated per arm), baseline characteristics were largely balanced with median 2 prior lines of therapy; 28% vs 30% of pts had 1 prior line, 28% vs 23% had 2, 45% vs 48% had ≥3 in the pola + BR vs BR arms, respectively. Most pts (75% vs 85%) were refractory to last prior treatment. PN events occurred in 40% (18/45) of pts treated with pola + BR (all grade [Gr] 1-2). At clinical cutoff, median time to PN resolution was approx. 8 days (range 0-69) with 56% (10/18) of pts experiencing complete resolution of PN. Eight pts had ongoing PN: 4 discontinued study early due to death from disease progression or AE (further follow up for PN resolution not possible), 3 had unresolved Gr 1 PN, and 1 had improving PN (max. Gr 1). Second malignancies occurred in 4% (2/45) of pts treated with pola + BR (1 prostate cancer; 1 squamous cell carcinoma and myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS]) and 5% (2/39) of pts in the BR arm (1 epiglottic carcinoma and MDS; 1 papillary thyroid cancer). In the Ph II RAN arms (pola + BR vs BR) updated median INV-assessed PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 7.5 (4.9, 17.0) vs 2.0 (1.5, 3.7) mo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; 95% CI 0.20, 0.56); median OS (95% CI) was 12.4 (9.0, 32.0) vs 4.7 (3.7, 8.3) mo (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.24, 0.71), respectively (Figure). Median time to first response was 2 mo (range 1.8-5.3). Median DOR (95% CI) for all responding pts in the pola + BR (N=28) vs BR (N=13) arms was 12.7 (5.8, 27.9) vs 4.1 (2.6, 12.7) mo (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.19, 0.91). Median DOR (95% CI) for confirmed responders in the pola + BR (N=19) vs BR (N=7) arms was 27.9 (10.3, NE) vs 12.7 (7.7, NE) mo (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.14, 1.32). Nearly half (47%, 9/19) of pts with confirmed responses to pola + BR remained event free at clinical cutoff with 8 pts in CR and 1 pt in partial response (downgraded from CR due to missing bone marrow biopsy based on modified Lugano Criteria). Of these 9 pts, 8 had DORs ranging from 22+ to 34+ mo (1 pt consolidated with allogeneic transplant) and 1 pt withdrew early from study after 14.5 mo of response. In the BR arm, 2 pts maintained responses without events; both had consolidative therapy (1 radiation, 1 allogeneic transplant). Baseline characteristics of pts with confirmed responses in the pola + BR arm are shown in the Table. In the Ph Ib cohort, 3/6 pts were confirmed responders: 1 pt progressed at 45 mo, 2 pts had ongoing responses of 29+ and 44+ mo, respectively. Conclusions: No new safety signals were identified with longer follow-up. PN events were low grade, manageable and mostly reversible. Adding pola to BR did not increase risk of second malignancies. While median time-to-event endpoints have not changed significantly since the last data cut, longer follow-up demonstrates notable durability of response in a proportion of pts treated with pola + BR, many of whom had refractory disease and received multiple lines of prior therapy. Pola + BR represents a promising new treatment for pts with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL. Disclosures Sehn: Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; TEVA Pharmaceuticals Industries: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; TEVA Pharmaceuticals Industries: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Ortho: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apobiologix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Ortho: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria. Matasar:Bayer: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Research Funding; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses , Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses , Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other. Flowers:BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Optimum Rx: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy. Kamdar:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. McMillan:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hertzberg:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Assouline:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Kim:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Donga: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; J + J: Research Funding. Ozcan:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Other: Travel, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Jazz: Other: Travel; Sanofi: Other: Travel; BMS: Other: Travel; MSD: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Abdi Ibrahim: Other: Travel; Janssen: Research Funding, Travel; Celgene: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Archigen: Research Funding. Croft:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Hirata:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Cheng:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Ku:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Herrera:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: GO29365 (pola + BR vs BR in relapsed/refractory DLBCL). Rituximab (Rituxan) is approved for use in relapsed/refractory low-grade NHL and in previously untreated DLBCL with CHOP, but is not approved for use in relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Bendamustine (Levact) is

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchFrench-language works237,207