Safety, Efficacy, and PK of the BCL2 Inhibitor Venetoclax in Combination with Chemotherapy in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Phase 1 Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Venetoclax (VEN) is a highly selective B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with hematologic malignancies. VEN has antileukemic activity in pediatric patient (pt)-derived xenograft models and cell lines. Data from these and ongoing adult studies of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) provide rationale for trials in a pediatric population. This study evaluated VEN as monotherapy (monoTx) and in combination with disease-specific chemotherapy (CTx) regimens in pediatric and young adult pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) malignancies. Preliminary results from acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and AML pts are reported. Methods: This phase 1 open-label, 2-part, multicenter study (NCT03236857) enrolled pts newborn to <25 years with R/R malignancies. In Part 1 (dose determination; DD), pts received oral VEN daily. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk was mitigated by a 3-day ramp-up to a weight- or age- (pts <2 years) adjusted adult-equivalent target VEN dose of 800 mg. Dose determination using a Bayesian optimal interval design was based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) assessed during the first 21 days of VEN monoTx. Part 2 (cohort expansion) used the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; 800 mg VEN), and enrolled pts with R/R ALL and AML. In Part 2, CTx was added immediately after the VEN ramp-up, removing the 21-day monoTx period. Primary endpoints were safety, determination of DLT and RP2D, and assessment of VEN pharmacokinetics (PK). Secondary endpoints included preliminary efficacy of VEN monoTx and combined with CTx as assessed by the investigator. Minimal residual disease (MRD) in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow was assessed by flow cytometry or quantitative PCR as an exploratory objective. Results: As of May 30, 2019, 29 pts were enrolled with AML (n=18; 10 DD plus 8 expansion) or ALL (n=11; 5 DD plus 6 expansion). Median age was 6 years (range 1-25); 59% were male (Table). Pts had a median of ≥6 prior therapies; 52% had prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Median time on study was 2.5 months (range 3-13.5 months); 76% of pts discontinued VEN, due to progressive disease (38%), physician decision (14%), to pursue HSCT (14%), or adverse events (AEs; 10%). Five pts (17%) had fatal AEs related to disease progression considered unrelated to VEN. Preliminary PK data for pts in the DD cohort demonstrated that the weight-based dosing scheme resulted in similar VEN plasma concentrations across the wide weight and age range of enrolled pts. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) in all 29 pts receiving VEN plus CTx were vomiting (52%), diarrhea (52%), hypokalemia (48%), increased ALT (48%), febrile neutropenia (45%), increased AST (45%), and anemia (41%). On VEN monoTx or combination Tx, grade ≥3 TEAEs related to VEN Tx occurred in 65% of pts; serious AEs related to VEN occurred in 24% of pts. Grade 5 AEs unrelated to VEN were observed in 2 pts with AML (respiratory failure and hypoxia) and 3 pts with ALL (n=1: lung infection; n=2: multiorgan failure), all in context of progressive disease. No DLTs occurred in the 21-day monoTx period. One AML and 1 ALL pt experienced laboratory TLS (grade 3) on VEN plus CTx; this resolved with standard care. For AML pts, the best response after 21 days of monoTx was stable disease. In Part 1, 1 pt had complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) after 2 cycles of azacitidine plus VEN. In Part 2, 1 pt achieved a CR after 1 cycle of VEN plus azacitidine. Overall objective response rate (ORR) for AML pts was 11%. For ALL pts, ORR was 27% in Parts 1 and 2 with VEN combination Tx. The best response after 21 days of monoTx was partial remission, with 2 pts achieving CRi after addition of 1 or 2 cycles of VEN plus dexamethasone-vincristine-peg-asparaginase. In Part 2, 1 pt achieved CRi after 1 cycle of VEN plus vincristine-peg-asparaginase. MRD negativity (<10−4 leukemic cells) was observed in 3/11 (27%) ALL pts, and 0 AML pts. Conclusions: VEN plus CTx was well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities in pediatric pts with heavily treated/refractory ALL or AML. VEN monoTx led to few discontinuations or dose reductions due to AEs, and few serious AEs attributable to VEN. There was preliminary evidence of efficacy of VEN combined with CTx in this heavily treated pt population, including those with prior HSCT, which is notable. Further enrollment, follow-up, and correlative biomarker analyses are ongoing. Disclosures Karol: Abbvie: Other: Unrelated to this study, St. Jude has received a charitable contribution from AbbVie, Inc. The charitable contribution is not being used for clinical or research activities, including any activities related to this study.. Bittencourt:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations expenses; Novartis: Consultancy. Gore:Amgen: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Service on Data Safety Monitoring Committee; travel, accommodations, expenses; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel expenses; Anchiano: Equity Ownership, Other: spouse employment and company leadership; Blueprint Medicines: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Equity Ownership, Other: DSMC member; Clovis: Equity Ownership; Mirati: Equity Ownership; Sanofi Paris: Equity Ownership. O'Brien:Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; BTG: Research Funding. Fraser:Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Gambart:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses. Zwaan:Sanofi: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy; Jazz pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel support; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Bourquin:Servier: Other: Travel support. Loh:Medisix Therapeutics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Caron:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Other: may own stock. Prine:AbbVie: Employment, Other: Stock/stock options. Salem:AbbVie: Employment, Other: Stock/stock options. Unnebrink:AbbVie Germany: Employment, Other: Stock/stock options. Tong:AbbVie: Employment, Other: stock or options. Palenski:Abbvie: Employment, Other: Stock/ stock options. Place:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».