Mitigation of Scaling Potential of Seawater in High Temperature Environment Using Phosphonate Scale Inhibitor
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Laboratory analysis was conducted in order to study the effect of a phosphonate scale inhibitor on a mixture of hypersaline Arabian Gulf seawater and formation water under high temperature/high pressure (HT/HP) applications. The objective of this study was to identify the minimum scale inhibitor concentration required at various temperatures to achieve a cost-effective solution in minimizing the formation of common oilfield scales. Development of such a product would aid in the utilization of seawater-based fracturing fluids by controlling the scaling tendencies of the system, especially when exposed to formation waters. Utilizing a scaling software, various types of scales were modeled by testing different seawater/formation water ratios at temperatures ranging from 270 – 330°F. A dynamic scale loop was used which allowed seawater and formation water to be pumped into the system, thereby generating differential pressure data. The exponential increase in pressure would indicate scale formation. Various concentrations of scale inhibitor were then introduced to the mixtures and tested to determine the minimum scale inhibitor required for scale mitigation. Compatibility tests were also conducted to test for the efficacy of the scale inhibitor. Based on the scaling software, barite was identified as the primary scale generated. Barite scale has a low solubility of 2 mg/L and is one of the most difficult scales to mitigate. The highest concentration of barite scale occurred in a 50/50 ratio mixture of formation water and seawater. For all the temperatures tested, the scale loop was run at the concentration with the most barium sulfate present. The results for this research concluded that at 270°F and 300°F, the minimum scale inhibitor concentration was 2000 ppm and 1500 ppm, respectively. Both treatments successfully mitigated the following types of scales: barium sulfate, calcium sulfate(s), and strontium sulfate. At 330°F, the minimum scale inhibitor concentration was lower. This decreasing trend in scale inhibitor concentration as temperature was increased is attributed to the temperature constraint of phosphonate scale inhibitors. As a result, adding the phosphonate scale inhibitor contributed to the formation of calcium phosphonate complexes that led to the rise in pressure in the scale loop test. This hindered the efficiency of the treatment and portrayed the dramatic effects of temperature and inhibitor concentration on scale mitigation. This research pushes the thermal constraints of a phosphonate scale inhibitor up to 330°F to test its efficiency and overall treatment integrity. There are also fracturing fluid applications introduced utilizing a seawater source with one of the highest total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations in the world. Barium sulfate and other scales were successfully mitigated at various high-temperature applications for these systems utilizing a phosphate scale inhibitor.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».