Mitigation of Scaling Potential of Seawater in High Temperature Environment Using Phosphonate Scale Inhibitor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Laboratory analysis was conducted in order to study the effect of a phosphonate scale inhibitor on a mixture of hypersaline Arabian Gulf seawater and formation water under high temperature/high pressure (HT/HP) applications. The objective of this study was to identify the minimum scale inhibitor concentration required at various temperatures to achieve a cost-effective solution in minimizing the formation of common oilfield scales. Development of such a product would aid in the utilization of seawater-based fracturing fluids by controlling the scaling tendencies of the system, especially when exposed to formation waters. Utilizing a scaling software, various types of scales were modeled by testing different seawater/formation water ratios at temperatures ranging from 270 – 330°F. A dynamic scale loop was used which allowed seawater and formation water to be pumped into the system, thereby generating differential pressure data. The exponential increase in pressure would indicate scale formation. Various concentrations of scale inhibitor were then introduced to the mixtures and tested to determine the minimum scale inhibitor required for scale mitigation. Compatibility tests were also conducted to test for the efficacy of the scale inhibitor. Based on the scaling software, barite was identified as the primary scale generated. Barite scale has a low solubility of 2 mg/L and is one of the most difficult scales to mitigate. The highest concentration of barite scale occurred in a 50/50 ratio mixture of formation water and seawater. For all the temperatures tested, the scale loop was run at the concentration with the most barium sulfate present. The results for this research concluded that at 270°F and 300°F, the minimum scale inhibitor concentration was 2000 ppm and 1500 ppm, respectively. Both treatments successfully mitigated the following types of scales: barium sulfate, calcium sulfate(s), and strontium sulfate. At 330°F, the minimum scale inhibitor concentration was lower. This decreasing trend in scale inhibitor concentration as temperature was increased is attributed to the temperature constraint of phosphonate scale inhibitors. As a result, adding the phosphonate scale inhibitor contributed to the formation of calcium phosphonate complexes that led to the rise in pressure in the scale loop test. This hindered the efficiency of the treatment and portrayed the dramatic effects of temperature and inhibitor concentration on scale mitigation. This research pushes the thermal constraints of a phosphonate scale inhibitor up to 330°F to test its efficiency and overall treatment integrity. There are also fracturing fluid applications introduced utilizing a seawater source with one of the highest total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations in the world. Barium sulfate and other scales were successfully mitigated at various high-temperature applications for these systems utilizing a phosphate scale inhibitor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".