MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2985741206 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-130251

Targeted Mass Spectrometry-Based Serum M-Protein Monitoring for Early Relapse Detection

2019· article· en· W2985741206 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Zac McDonald, Mariya Liyasova, Paul Taylor, Xin Xu, Kathleen Gorospe, Chenyu Yao, Qixin Liu, Liqiang Yang, Bin Ma, J Píza, Donna Reece, Suzanne Trudel

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMelphalanInternal medicineSerum protein electrophoresisMultiple myelomaGastroenterologyImmunologyMonoclonalAntibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background For most Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, M-protein is the gold standard biomarker for disease diagnosis and monitoring. Traditional methods such as serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) lack the sensitivity to detect M-protein in patients with minimal residual disease. At ASH 2018, we reported a Mass Spectrometry (MS)-based highly sensitive assay (REmAb) for detecting and quantifying M-protein. This assay exploits the uniqueness of the M-protein sequence and can detect 1 M-protein in 10,000 polyclonal IgG. The current study utilized this established assay to first sequence then monitor M-protein in sera from diagnosis through treatment for patients from the first MCRN-001 Canadian national trial with bortezomib (BTZ)-based pre-induction (PI), augmented high-dose chemotherapy with busulfan + melphalan (BuMel) before ASCT and lenalidomide (Len) maintenance post-ASCT. Methods MCRN-001 trial patients were first induced with BTZ before harvesting stem cells. Eligible MM patients received BuMel prior to ASCT. Busulfan was administered IV at 3.2 mg/kg on days -5 to -3, or days -6 to -4 days pre-ASCT (Day 0) and melphalan was given at 140 mg/m2 on day -2 or -3 pre-ASCT. Len administration began 100 days post-ASCT at 10 mg/d (increased when appropriate to 15 mg/d) and continued until progressive disease (PD) onset. IMWG criteria was used to monitor clinical response and PD. 78 patients enrolled in this trial; only 58 offered consent for M-protein monitoring with MS. Serum samples were acquired at time of pre-induction (PI), before ASCT (screening sample), post-ASCT on day 100, every 3 months for the first year and then every 6 months until PD. The M-protein sequence was determined with the REmAb protein sequencing platform from either PI or screening samples when the PI sample was unavailable. For M-protein quantification, each sample was digested with trypsin prior to analysis by liquid chromatography tandem MS with an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid or Q-Exactive instrument. Patient-specific, unique tryptic peptides, with at least one peptide from each Heavy and Light chain, were targeted by the MS assay. To monitor changes in M-protein levels per patient post-diagnosis and through treatment to complete remission (CR) and/or PD, this study used MS peak areas of patient-specific unique peptides normalized against peak areas of human serum albumin or spiked-in standard peptides. Results M-protein sequencing In this study, the lowest M-protein serum concentration required for sequencing was 0.2 g/dL. 48 out of 58 (83%) patient-specific M-proteins were sequenced from serum. 5 out of 48 patients sequenced discontinued the study early and were excluded from further analysis. M-protein monitoring 24 out of the 43 achieved CR. The M-proteins of these patients were monitored by MS to study early relapse detection. M-protein levels could be monitored by MS in all these patients from diagnosis through CR to PD onset, even when M-protein was undetectable by SPEP and IFE. A separate serial dilution test estimated that the limit of quantification can reach as low as 0.03 mg/dL. 3 patients who had achieved CR eventually relapsed (PD). In all 3 PD patients, a 2 to 200 fold increase in M-protein in 2 consecutive tests half a year apart was detected by MS 6 months earlier than clinical confirmation of PD by conventional testing. The other 21 had not progressed at time of analysis. In the non-progressor group, the M-protein levels detected by MS either continued to decrease during CR or remained relatively stable. Only 3 out of 21 patients demonstrated a 2-fold increase in M-protein level in any 2 consecutive tests. Figure 1 shows representative data for two patients. Conclusions This study demonstrates that M-protein sequencing and targeted MS assay can be used to monitor serum M-protein levels sensitively even when SPEP and IFE fail to detect M-protein. Based on this assay, a 2-fold increase in serum M-protein levels in the past 6 months can reliably predict disease progression in the next 6 months for patients achieving CR. In the 24 studied patients, the method has 100% sensitivity and 86% specificity at predicting disease progression from CR prior to detection by standard methods. Future work will analyze more patient samples to confirm the findings and investigation into criteria surrounding the 2-fold M-protein increase observed in CR patients and relapse post CR. Disclosures McDonald: Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Liyasova:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Taylor:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Xu:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Gorospe:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Yao:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Liu:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Ma:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Equity Ownership. Reece:Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Trudel:GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: The use of IV busulfan and melphalan as conditioning for myeloma transplants is off-label.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→