MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2985741206 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-130251

Targeted Mass Spectrometry-Based Serum M-Protein Monitoring for Early Relapse Detection

2019· article· en· W2985741206 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zac McDonald, Mariya Liyasova, Paul Taylor, Xin Xu, Kathleen Gorospe, Chenyu Yao, Qixin Liu, Liqiang Yang, Bin Ma, J Píza, Donna Reece, Suzanne Trudel

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMelphalanInternal medicineSerum protein electrophoresisMultiple myelomaGastroenterologyImmunologyMonoclonalAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background For most Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, M-protein is the gold standard biomarker for disease diagnosis and monitoring. Traditional methods such as serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) lack the sensitivity to detect M-protein in patients with minimal residual disease. At ASH 2018, we reported a Mass Spectrometry (MS)-based highly sensitive assay (REmAb) for detecting and quantifying M-protein. This assay exploits the uniqueness of the M-protein sequence and can detect 1 M-protein in 10,000 polyclonal IgG. The current study utilized this established assay to first sequence then monitor M-protein in sera from diagnosis through treatment for patients from the first MCRN-001 Canadian national trial with bortezomib (BTZ)-based pre-induction (PI), augmented high-dose chemotherapy with busulfan + melphalan (BuMel) before ASCT and lenalidomide (Len) maintenance post-ASCT. Methods MCRN-001 trial patients were first induced with BTZ before harvesting stem cells. Eligible MM patients received BuMel prior to ASCT. Busulfan was administered IV at 3.2 mg/kg on days -5 to -3, or days -6 to -4 days pre-ASCT (Day 0) and melphalan was given at 140 mg/m2 on day -2 or -3 pre-ASCT. Len administration began 100 days post-ASCT at 10 mg/d (increased when appropriate to 15 mg/d) and continued until progressive disease (PD) onset. IMWG criteria was used to monitor clinical response and PD. 78 patients enrolled in this trial; only 58 offered consent for M-protein monitoring with MS. Serum samples were acquired at time of pre-induction (PI), before ASCT (screening sample), post-ASCT on day 100, every 3 months for the first year and then every 6 months until PD. The M-protein sequence was determined with the REmAb protein sequencing platform from either PI or screening samples when the PI sample was unavailable. For M-protein quantification, each sample was digested with trypsin prior to analysis by liquid chromatography tandem MS with an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid or Q-Exactive instrument. Patient-specific, unique tryptic peptides, with at least one peptide from each Heavy and Light chain, were targeted by the MS assay. To monitor changes in M-protein levels per patient post-diagnosis and through treatment to complete remission (CR) and/or PD, this study used MS peak areas of patient-specific unique peptides normalized against peak areas of human serum albumin or spiked-in standard peptides. Results M-protein sequencing In this study, the lowest M-protein serum concentration required for sequencing was 0.2 g/dL. 48 out of 58 (83%) patient-specific M-proteins were sequenced from serum. 5 out of 48 patients sequenced discontinued the study early and were excluded from further analysis. M-protein monitoring 24 out of the 43 achieved CR. The M-proteins of these patients were monitored by MS to study early relapse detection. M-protein levels could be monitored by MS in all these patients from diagnosis through CR to PD onset, even when M-protein was undetectable by SPEP and IFE. A separate serial dilution test estimated that the limit of quantification can reach as low as 0.03 mg/dL. 3 patients who had achieved CR eventually relapsed (PD). In all 3 PD patients, a 2 to 200 fold increase in M-protein in 2 consecutive tests half a year apart was detected by MS 6 months earlier than clinical confirmation of PD by conventional testing. The other 21 had not progressed at time of analysis. In the non-progressor group, the M-protein levels detected by MS either continued to decrease during CR or remained relatively stable. Only 3 out of 21 patients demonstrated a 2-fold increase in M-protein level in any 2 consecutive tests. Figure 1 shows representative data for two patients. Conclusions This study demonstrates that M-protein sequencing and targeted MS assay can be used to monitor serum M-protein levels sensitively even when SPEP and IFE fail to detect M-protein. Based on this assay, a 2-fold increase in serum M-protein levels in the past 6 months can reliably predict disease progression in the next 6 months for patients achieving CR. In the 24 studied patients, the method has 100% sensitivity and 86% specificity at predicting disease progression from CR prior to detection by standard methods. Future work will analyze more patient samples to confirm the findings and investigation into criteria surrounding the 2-fold M-protein increase observed in CR patients and relapse post CR. Disclosures McDonald: Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Liyasova:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Taylor:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Xu:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Gorospe:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Yao:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Liu:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Employment. Ma:Rapid Novor Inc Kitchener: Equity Ownership. Reece:Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Trudel:GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: The use of IV busulfan and melphalan as conditioning for myeloma transplants is off-label.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→