MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2986211227 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-127119

MANIFEST, a Phase 2 Study of CPI-0610, a Bromodomain and Extraterminal Domain Inhibitor (BETi), As Monotherapy or "Add-on" to Ruxolitinib, in Patients with Refractory or Intolerant Advanced Myelofibrosis

2019· article· en· W2986211227 sur OpenAlexaff
John Mascarenhas, Marina Kremyanskaya, Ronald Hoffman, Prithviraj Bose, Moshe Talpaz, Claire Harrison, Vikas Gupta, Brian Leber, Shireen Sirhan, Sujan Kabir, Adrian M. Senderowicz, James Shao, Jennifer A. Mertz, Patrick Trojer, Srđan Verstovšek

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensJewish General HospitalMcMaster UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRuxolitinibMyelofibrosisBromodomainMedicineInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)Phases of clinical researchOncologyPharmacologyClinical trialChemistryBiologyBiochemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: CPI-0610, a selective and potent small molecule BETi, has shown clinical activity and a wide therapeutic window in a Phase 1 lymphoma study (Blum KA, 2018). BET proteins regulate key oncogenic pathways, including NFκB and TGFβ signaling which are important drivers of pro-inflammatory cytokine (Ck) expression and bone marrow fibrosis, respectively, and are implicated in myelofibrosis (MF) pathogenesis. Ruxolitinib (rux), a Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor (JAKi), is the only approved therapy for MF, and primarily reduces spleen volume and provides symptomatic relief. Patients (pts) receiving rux may achieve suboptimal responses or can develop treatment-emergent anemia and worsening transfusion dependence. There is no approved treatment for pts who are refractory/intolerant to rux. Preclinical studies suggest that a combination of BETi and JAKi can result in synergistic reduction of splenomegaly, bone marrow (BM) fibrosis and mutant cell burden (Kleppe, 2018). Our objective is to evaluate CPI-0610 alone or "add-on" to rux (CPI-0610 + rux) in MF pts who are refractory/intolerant or have inadequate response to rux. Method: This is a global, multicenter, open label Phase 2 study (MANIFEST) of CPI-0610 monotherapy in MF pts who are refractory/intolerant to rux (Arm 1) or CPI-0610 + rux in MF pts who have suboptimal response to rux (Arm 2). Pts are further stratified based on transfusion dependence status [transfusion dependent (TD), defined as an average of ≥2 units per month over 12 wks, or non-TD cohorts]. The starting dose of CPI-0610 is 125 mg daily on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle in both arms. Primary endpoint: spleen volume response (SVR) for non-TD cohorts or TD to transfusion independence (TI, no transfusion for consecutive 12 wks) conversion for TD cohorts; secondary endpoints: change in total symptom score (TSS) per MFSAF v4.0, patient global impression of change (PGIC), safety and PK; additional endpoints: changes in proinflammatory Ck levels, BM morphology and mutant allele burden. Results: As of 27 June 2019, 48 pts enrolled- 12 treated with CPI-0610 monotherapy (Arm 1) and 36 with CPI-0610 + rux (Arm 2). At baseline, median age: 69 years (41-88), gender: 28 (58%) male, ECOG ≤1: 45 (94%) pts, primary MF: 33 (69%) pts, DIPSS score high: 10 (21%) pts, median platelet: 199 x 109/L (77-895), 34 (71%) pts with Hgb <10 g/dL, median spleen volume: 2183 cc (123-3909), median TSS: 17.6 (1.4-56), 46 (96%) pts had ≥1 JAK2/MPL/CALR mutations, and 34 (71%) pts had HMR (high molecular risk) mutations. 33 (69%) pts on treatment for ≥ 12 wks, 4 on treatment for > 18 months. Spleen volume reduction observed in 29 of 31 (94%) pts (median best change: -17% [range: -50.7, 10.2]) (Fig. 1A). TSS improvement reported in 26 of 28 (93%) pts (median best change: -46.4% [range: -95.3%, 27%]), 11 (39%) pts with ≥50% TSS improvement (Fig. 1B). PGIC improvement score in 28 of 33 (85%) pts; 21 (64%) reported much or very much improved scores. Increase in hemoglobin by 1.5 mg/dL post-baseline observed with both CPI-0610 monotherapy (4 of 8, 50%) and CPI-0610 + rux (4 of 25, 16%)). Improvement in BM fibrosis and/or reticulin by ≥1 Gr reported in 7 of 12 (58%) evaluable pts with baseline and 1 post-baseline biopsy and as early as 6-months of CPI-0610 treatment. 4 TD pts in Arm 2 treated with CPI-0610 + rux converted to TI- 2 of whom are TI for >36 wks, no longer anemic, and showed spleen volume reduction, improvement in symptom and BM fibrosis; 12 additional pts are being monitored for potential TI conversion. 41 pts remain active on treatment and 7 pts discontinued, including 1 pt, initially transplant ineligible, underwent stem cell transplantation after 6 cycles of CPI-0610 + rux treatment. Most common (≥20%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) of any Gr include diarrhea, nausea, cough and upper respiratory tract infection. Most common (≥5%) ≥3 Gr TEAE include anemia (8.3%) and thrombocytopenia (8.3%, asymptomatic, non-cumulative and generally reversible). Conclusions: Preliminary data indicate that CPI-0610 alone or "add-on" to rux is generally well-tolerated and provides clinical benefits in MF pts with inadequate responses or who are refractory to rux. Improvement in BM fibrosis and anemia responses indicate the potential for meaningful disease modification. Based on the available data, Arm 2 TD cohort has achieved proof-of-concept for TI. Further expansion of the MANIFEST study is ongoing. Updated data will be presented. Disclosures Mascarenhas: Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Merus: Research Funding; Pharmaessentia: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kremyanskaya:La Jolla: Consultancy; Incyte, Celgene, Constellation, Protagonist.: Research Funding. Hoffman:Merus: Research Funding. Bose:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Blueprint Medicine Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kartos: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding. Talpaz:Imago BioSciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding. Harrison:Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; AOP: Honoraria; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Promedior: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CTI: Speakers Bureau. Gupta:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Leber:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Sirhan:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kabir:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Senderowicz:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Employment; Puma Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shao:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Mertz:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trojer:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Verstovsek:CTI BioPharma Corp: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Pharma Essentia: Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Ital Pharma: Research Funding; Protaganist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,154
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,973

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations45
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207