MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2986519692 · doi:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_437_19

An “Orphan” in search of a treatment: Pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis

2019· article· en· W2986519692 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manjit Sharad Tendolkar

Notice bibliographique

RevueLung India · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAsymptomaticRare diseasePathologyPrimary ciliary dyskinesiaDiseaseLungInternal medicineBronchiectasis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

From the first macroscopic description of this disease by Malpighi[1] in 1868, and the first case report by Harbitz[2] in 1918 to coining of the term “pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis (PAM)” by Puhr[3] in 1933, we have succeeded in uncovering the pathophysiology and the genetic basis of the disease. The medical treatment, however, continues to elude us. PAM is a rare and a chronic disease characterized by the presence of extensive interalveolar calculi or microliths, spherical calcium and phosphate deposits, forming concentric lamellae surrounding an amorphous central nucleus measuring up to 2 μm.[4] The association of PAM with an autosomal recessive mutation of SLC34A2 gene which encodes for sodium phosphate cotransporter is well documented. This is the only phosphate transporter expressed in Type II pneumocytes. Degradation of surfactant produces phosphate which eventually accumulates to form microliths which characterize this disease. The hallmark of this disease is the clinico-radiological dissociation. This disease is often detected incidentally on the radiograph as the calcified lesions in the lung fields are difficult to be missed by the physician while the patient has minimal symptoms. More than 50% of the cases are asymptomatic. However, when symptomatic cough and breathlessness are the primary complaints, the former likely attributable to stimulation of unmyelinated c fibers in bronchial tree by microliths.[5] This disease is rare. Less than 100 cases have been reported from India in the literature, whereas the world literature has <1100 such cases. There is no definitive treatment for PAM. Given the minimal discomfort of the patient, physicians tend to manage this conservatively. In cases wherein the patient is symptomatic, there have been trials showing conflicting results by disodium etidronate in PAM. Although not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for PAM, it is one of the few drugs to be considered in our armamentarium against PAM. It acts by inhibiting formation of new pulmonary calcium phosphate crystallization and resolving previously formed calcifications. Apart from disodium etidronate, bisphosphonates therapy is being considered for PAM. The disease is often silent till respiratory insufficiency supervenes. Rate of progression remains varied. Death often occurs in the fifth decade of life from respiratory insufficiency and cor pulmonale. With the limitations of a definitive medical management, lung transplantation is the only definitive intervention which has shown benefit in the end-stage cases of PAM with respiratory failure.[6] In the current issue of Lung India, Jindal et al. reported the first case of PAM from India undergoing lung transplantation.[7] A study of this case reveals an end-stage disease given the dependence on oxygen and non invasive ventillation (NIV). Lung transplant was the only management that could be offered to this patient to improve survival and quality of life. Since the first successful double-lung transplant in humans in 1988, the first successful bilateral lung transplant in PAM was performed in France in 1992. A current literature review reveals 19 cases of PAM undergoing lung transplant including the present case. The longest survival continued follow-up beyond 15 years (single-lung transplant done in Canada in 2001).[8] The optimal time for referring a patient of PAM for lung transplant is not defined yet by guidelines; however, it is prudent to refer the patient before the onset of severe right ventricular dysfunction.[6] It worth noting in the present case report that given the advanced stage of the disease the biventricular function was well preserved, and hence, the benefit of lung transplant is likely to be optimal. The argument of single versus double-lung transplant favors the latter for the fear of persistent shunting of blood through native lung with single lung transplant. The literature documents four single-lung transplants, of which three have survived beyond 12 months, including the longest surviving follow-up at 15 years. Taking the present case in consideration, of ten double-lung transplants, seven survived beyond 12 months.[6] Till date, no recurrence has been documented in transplanted lungs. The benefit of lung transplant outweighs the risks of morbidity due to immunosuppression in advanced cases of PAM. As our expertise in lung transplantation and posttransplant care continues to grow, we are likely to see improved survival and increasing number of referrals. It is worth emphasizing that of till 2015, India reported 80 of the 1022 cases worldwide. Since then, 27 cases have been reported, of which ten are from India, including the present case.[5910] With an increasing proportion of cases being reported from India, a national registry of this “orphan” disease will help us better study the trends and improve management by having timely referrals for lung transplant.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,288

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,302 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLung IndiaMême sujetMedical Imaging and Pathology StudiesTravaux en français237 207