MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An “Orphan” in search of a treatment: Pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis

2019· article· en· W2986519692 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manjit Sharad Tendolkar

Bibliographic record

VenueLung India · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticRare diseasePathologyPrimary ciliary dyskinesiaDiseaseLungInternal medicineBronchiectasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the first macroscopic description of this disease by Malpighi[1] in 1868, and the first case report by Harbitz[2] in 1918 to coining of the term “pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis (PAM)” by Puhr[3] in 1933, we have succeeded in uncovering the pathophysiology and the genetic basis of the disease. The medical treatment, however, continues to elude us. PAM is a rare and a chronic disease characterized by the presence of extensive interalveolar calculi or microliths, spherical calcium and phosphate deposits, forming concentric lamellae surrounding an amorphous central nucleus measuring up to 2 μm.[4] The association of PAM with an autosomal recessive mutation of SLC34A2 gene which encodes for sodium phosphate cotransporter is well documented. This is the only phosphate transporter expressed in Type II pneumocytes. Degradation of surfactant produces phosphate which eventually accumulates to form microliths which characterize this disease. The hallmark of this disease is the clinico-radiological dissociation. This disease is often detected incidentally on the radiograph as the calcified lesions in the lung fields are difficult to be missed by the physician while the patient has minimal symptoms. More than 50% of the cases are asymptomatic. However, when symptomatic cough and breathlessness are the primary complaints, the former likely attributable to stimulation of unmyelinated c fibers in bronchial tree by microliths.[5] This disease is rare. Less than 100 cases have been reported from India in the literature, whereas the world literature has <1100 such cases. There is no definitive treatment for PAM. Given the minimal discomfort of the patient, physicians tend to manage this conservatively. In cases wherein the patient is symptomatic, there have been trials showing conflicting results by disodium etidronate in PAM. Although not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for PAM, it is one of the few drugs to be considered in our armamentarium against PAM. It acts by inhibiting formation of new pulmonary calcium phosphate crystallization and resolving previously formed calcifications. Apart from disodium etidronate, bisphosphonates therapy is being considered for PAM. The disease is often silent till respiratory insufficiency supervenes. Rate of progression remains varied. Death often occurs in the fifth decade of life from respiratory insufficiency and cor pulmonale. With the limitations of a definitive medical management, lung transplantation is the only definitive intervention which has shown benefit in the end-stage cases of PAM with respiratory failure.[6] In the current issue of Lung India, Jindal et al. reported the first case of PAM from India undergoing lung transplantation.[7] A study of this case reveals an end-stage disease given the dependence on oxygen and non invasive ventillation (NIV). Lung transplant was the only management that could be offered to this patient to improve survival and quality of life. Since the first successful double-lung transplant in humans in 1988, the first successful bilateral lung transplant in PAM was performed in France in 1992. A current literature review reveals 19 cases of PAM undergoing lung transplant including the present case. The longest survival continued follow-up beyond 15 years (single-lung transplant done in Canada in 2001).[8] The optimal time for referring a patient of PAM for lung transplant is not defined yet by guidelines; however, it is prudent to refer the patient before the onset of severe right ventricular dysfunction.[6] It worth noting in the present case report that given the advanced stage of the disease the biventricular function was well preserved, and hence, the benefit of lung transplant is likely to be optimal. The argument of single versus double-lung transplant favors the latter for the fear of persistent shunting of blood through native lung with single lung transplant. The literature documents four single-lung transplants, of which three have survived beyond 12 months, including the longest surviving follow-up at 15 years. Taking the present case in consideration, of ten double-lung transplants, seven survived beyond 12 months.[6] Till date, no recurrence has been documented in transplanted lungs. The benefit of lung transplant outweighs the risks of morbidity due to immunosuppression in advanced cases of PAM. As our expertise in lung transplantation and posttransplant care continues to grow, we are likely to see improved survival and increasing number of referrals. It is worth emphasizing that of till 2015, India reported 80 of the 1022 cases worldwide. Since then, 27 cases have been reported, of which ten are from India, including the present case.[5910] With an increasing proportion of cases being reported from India, a national registry of this “orphan” disease will help us better study the trends and improve management by having timely referrals for lung transplant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLung IndiaSame topicMedical Imaging and Pathology StudiesFrench-language works237,207