Combination of Venetoclax and Ibrutinib Increases bcl2-Dependent Apoptotic Priming, Reduces ITK-Phosphorylation and Is Clinically Promising in Relapsed/Refractory T-Prolymphocytic Leukemia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a rare and aggressive T-lymphoid malignancy with poor response to current treatment strategies. We recently demonstrated single agent activity of venetoclax in relapsed/refractory (r/r) T-PLL, however resistance developed on mono-therapy. We here set out to identify partners for an effective combinatorial treatment concept. Methods To overcome bcl-2 inhibitor resistance we utilized primary T-PLL patient samples and applied a combinatorial next-generation functional drug screen for venetoclax and 25 additional therapeutic agents (Fig.1a). Molecular mechanisms of drug combinations were evaluated by BH3-family member profiling and mass spectrometry. Protein expression was assessed by Western Blot and viability by AnnexinV/Hoechst staining. The best scoring combination was evaluated in two late stage r/r T-PLL patients. Results Pairwise combinations screen of venetoclax with candidate small molecule inhibitors and chemotherapeutic drugs on primary T-PLL cells revealed synergistic action of venetoclax with ibrutinib, idelalisib, and 5-azacytidine, and to lower extents Olaparib, Temsirolimus, Ruxolitinib and Belinostat whereas cisplatin antagonized the effect of venetoclax across all patient samples tested (Fig 1b). The combination of venetoclax and ibrutinib resulted in substantial reduction of viability in primary T-PLL cells (Fig 1c). BH3-profiling on primary T-PLL samples with and without ibrutinib treatment demonstrated enhanced overall priming with predominant increase of bcl-2 dependency upon ibrutinib treatment (Fig 1d). Addition of ibrutinib to venetoclax led to decreased phosphorylation of ITK in vivo (Fig 1e). Two patients suffering from r/r T-PLL after failing at least two treatment lines including alemtuzumab were treated with the combination of venetoclax and ibrutinib resulting in significant clinical responses with substantial drops in leukocytosis and LDH as well as substantial clinical improvement (Fig 2a, b). The dynamic BH3 profiling in samples taken from these patients confirmed that the addition of ibrutinib is indeed increasing overall priming and Bcl-2 dependency (Fig 2c, d). Conclusion Our findings suggest efficacy of combinatorial treatment of venetoclax with ibrutinib in T-PLL. Mechanistically, ibrutinib dephosphorylated ITK in T-PLL cells and, furthermore, enhanced BCL2 dependency, both, in-vivo and in-vitro. Patients treated with the combination venetoclax and ibrutinib experienced profound clinical responses which needs further evaluation in an prospective clinical study on a larger cohort of r/r T-PLL patients. Disclosures Herbaux: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Mayerhoefer:Siemens: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Jaeger:Novartis, Roche, Sandoz: Consultancy; AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Takeda Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene, Eisai, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Takeda Millennium, MSD, BMS, Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene, Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, AbbVie, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Davids:AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Adaptive, Biotechnologies, Astra-Zeneca, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, TG therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Genentech, Janssen, MEI, Pharmacyclics, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Verastem: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma, Ascentage Pharma, Genentech, MEI pharma, Pharmacyclics, Surface Oncology, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Research Funding; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Staber:Takeda-Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Ibrutinib - BTK inhibitor Venetoclax - bcl2 inhibitor
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».