MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2988013001 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-130602

Fas Mutations in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL): Implications for Disease Progression and Therapeutic Resistance

2019· article· en· W2988013001 sur OpenAlexaff
Ryan N. Rys, M. Venkataraman, Jibin Zeng, Koren K. Mann, Nathalie A. Johnson

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueCell death mechanisms and regulation
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLymphomaFas receptorCancer researchFas ligandImmunologyBiologyImmune systemAggressive lymphomaDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaProgrammed cell deathApoptosisMedicineRituximabGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma and standard frontline treatment is carried out with R-CHOP chemotherapy. However, DLBCL remains an extremely heterogenous disease and refractory/relapse events are common. Recent sequencing experiments have found 18% of relapsed DLBCL contains Fas mutations, an increase from mutations seen at initial diagnosis. Fas receptor (FasR) is a transmembrane protein encoded by the Fas gene that is critical for the induction of extrinsic apoptosis. Once FasR is bound by Fas Ligand expressed on cytotoxic T cells, it initiates the formation of the death-inducing signaling complex and subsequent programmed cell death. Downregulation of FasR expression on B cells has also been a proposed method by which B cell lymphomas are able to evade immune surveillance. Therefore, we hypothesized that dysfunction in Fas signaling contributes to chemotherapy resistance and disease relapse in DLBCL. We used an immune-competent mouse model that can generate aggressive B cell lymphomas (Eμ-Myc) to investigate the role of Fas mutations in lymphomagenesis and response to chemotherapy. Methods: We designed a breeding program, in which we crossed heterozygous Lpr mice, which harbor a germline mutation in Fas, with Eμ-Myc mice. This led to the development of mice that grow spontaneous Eμ-Myc lymphomas with either FasWT or Fasmut gene alterations, hereafter designated WT and MUT. These mice were analyzed for disease progression and their lymphoma cells were intravenously injected into C57BL/6 mice to create 2nd generation lymphomas. A 3rd generation cohort was developed similarly from injecting 2nd generation lymphoma cells into another group of C57BL/6 mice. 3rd generation mice were treated with components of R-CHOP chemotherapy, namely doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide. Overall and disease-related survival were monitored for all cohorts, and lymph node and spleen tissues were preserved from all 3 generations as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks. A tissue microarray was created to analyze the tumor microenvironment and elements of extrinsic apoptosis/immune response. Immunohistochemistry staining of the microarray using T cell and lymphoma-related markers is currently ongoing (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, FoxP3, TP53, Nfkb, Bcl2). Results: In the 1st generation, 21/37 WT and 11/18 MUT mice developed lymphoma, with the time to lymphoma death being similar in both groups (170 days versus 140 days, respectively, p =0.32). Of the 32 primary NHLs generated, 3 didn't have sufficient viable cells to perform subsequent experiments. The remaining 29 NHLs were injected into at least two different C57BL/6 mice, with the exception of one who only had enough cells to inject into one mouse. Thus, the second generation included 57 mice transplanted with 29 primary NHLs. Lymphoma development was higher in the MUT cohort (12/37 WT and 14/20 MUT, p=0.011). The all-cause overall survival was not different between both genotypes (p=0.152), but lymphoma specific survival was significantly shorter in the MUT mice (67 days for MUT and 136 days for WT, p=0.026). In the 3rd generation, 93 mice developed lymphoma (54 WT and 39 MUT), of which 15 were used as untreated controls and 78 were treated with components of R-CHOP. Overall, WT mice appeared to have durable responses to therapy, as shown by increased survival when compared to controls across doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide groups (p=0.0147, 0.0406, 0.0321 respectively). However, no difference in survival was seen in the MUT cohort between treated and untreated controls. Conclusion: Fas mutations may provide survival advantages to lymphoma cells implanted into immune-competent mice. They may also promote resistance to R-CHOP, particularly vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, but the exact mechanism by which this occurs is unclear. The immune-tumor cell interactions are being investigated by IHC and will be presented. Disclosures Johnson: Roche: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; BD Biosciences: Other: Provided a significant proportion of the antibodies used in this project free of cost.; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCell death mechanisms and regulationTravaux en français237 207