MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2989265170 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-127562

Ibrutinib in Combination with Venetoclax Decreases Mitochondrial Bioenergetics through the Impaired BTK, AKT and AMPK/SIRT/PGC-1α Signaling Pathway in CLL

2019· article· en· W2989265170 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Subir Roy Chowdhury, Amandeep Singh, Edwin Nguyen, Aaron J. Marshall, James B. Johnston, Spencer B. Gibson, Versha Banerji

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of ManitobaResearch Institute in Oncology and HematologyCancerCare Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIbrutinibBruton's tyrosine kinaseAMPKProtein kinase BChronic lymphocytic leukemiaCancer researchVenetoclaxSignal transductionBiologyAMP-activated protein kinaseCell biologyPhosphorylationTyrosine kinaseProtein kinase ALeukemiaImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Objective: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the most common types of leukemia in adults. Altered mitochondrial metabolism has been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of CLL. Ibrutinib, an inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), and venetoclax, an inhibitor of B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) protein are approved therapies for CLL. The adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) signaling axis senses the metabolic demands of cells and regulates mitochondrial function. Silent information regulator T1 (SIRT1) is a cytoplasmic enzyme that mediates NAD+-dependent deacetylation of target substrates. The importance of BTK, AKT, and AMPK/SIRT/PGC-1α signaling pathway have to be explored yet in CLL. Ibrutinib and venetoclax may trigger a switching off of AMPK and /or SIRT1 signaling leading to impaired PGC-1α expression/activity and diminished mitochondrial activity. The effects of these drugs on mitochondrial bioenergetics profile, cell viability, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), reactive oxygen species (ROS) and protein levels of p-BTK, p-AKT, Bcl-2, p-AMPK, SIRT1, and PGC-1α were analyzed. We hypothesize that ibrutinib, along with venetoclax, will alter CLL mitochondrial bioenergetics profiles and function, cell viability, and ROS levels through the involvement of BTK, AKT and AMPK/SIRT/PGC-1α signaling pathway and enable lower doses and profound effects for combination therapies rather than single agent therapy. Methods: The high resolution Oroboros Oxygraph 2K (Oroboros Instruments, Austria), a Clarke-type oxygen electrode, is used to measure mitochondrial respiration rates of CLL cells at 370C. Freshly isolated CLL cells (10 mil. cells/ml) were added to the chamber in 2 ml of RPMI. After the measurement of basal respiration rates, the following chemicals were added: oligomycin (2uM), FCCP: carbonylcyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (2-12 uM), and antimycin A (2 uM). Oxygen consumption rate is expressed in pmol oxygen/s /mil. cells. Protein levels in CLL cell lysates were determined by Western blotting. Cell viability, MMP, and ROS were assessed by the flow cytometer (NovoCyte). Results: CLL cells obtained ex vivo from ibrutinib treated patients had decreased mitochondrial bioenergetics compared to pre-treatment samples. Primary CLL cells treated in vitro with sub-lethal doses of ibrutinib for 24 or 48h showed significantly decreased basal respiration rates, maximal respiration rates, and spare respiratory capacity compared to DMSO vehicle control. These parameters were also significantly affected by low doses (0.5 - 2 nM) of venetoclax. The combination treatment of ibrutinib with venetoclax for 24 or 48h significantly decreased these bioenergetics parameters compared to each individual drug alone except for the spare respiratory capacity vs venetoclax alone at 24 h. MMP was significantly decreased by these drug treatments and its combinations compared to DMSO. Cell viability was used to confirm a sub-lethal phenotype. ROS levels were significantly increased by venetoclax compared to DMSO, and in combination with ibrutinib vs ibrutinib alone. However, ROS levels by ibrutinib were not significantly changed compared to DMSO or venetoclax. Protein levels of p-BTK, p-AKT, p-AMPK, SIRT1, and PGC-1α were decreased by ibrutinib or venetoclax alone compared to DMSO and further decreased by the combination of these two drugs compared to single agent. Conclusion: CLL cells from ibrutinib treated patients, a clinically approved BTK inhibitor, demonstrated decreased bioenergetics similar to normal B-lymphocytes suggesting ibrutinib treatment normalizes the mitochondrial bioenergetics in CLL. Ibrutinib and venetoclax affected bioenergetics profiles in CLL cells at low doses. The combined effect of these drugs on the mitochondrial bioenergetics profiles and cell viability is more profound than each BTK or Bcl-2 inhibitor agent alone. Protein levels of p-BTK, p-AKT, p-AMPK, SIRT1, and PGC-1α in ibrutinib and venetoclax treated samples were reduced compared to DMSO and each single agent inhibitor. These novel data suggest the involvement of BTK, AKT and AMPK/SIRT/PGC-1α signaling pathway to target mitochondrial metabolism and provide rational therapeutic combinations that may lead to reduced toxicity and increased drug efficacy in CLL. Disclosures Johnston: Janssen: Research Funding. Banerji:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Licensing fee, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; CIHR: Research Funding; LLSC: Research Funding; Research Manitoba: Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Other: Licencing fee; CCMF: Research Funding; CancerCare Manitoba/University of Manitoba: Employment; CAPhO: Honoraria; BIOGEN: Other: Licensing fee.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,418
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,594

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207