82 Stage-specific expression of lineage marker genes and pluripotency marker distribution in porcine pre-implantation embryos
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Lineage specification in pre-implantation embryos has been revealed, and it was expedited recently by single cell studies. However, data on expression marker genes and proteins in porcine embryos were still missing. We aimed to investigate the expression and distribution of marker genes and proteins, respectively, in IVF and parthenogenetically activated (PA) embryos. For this, cumulus-free oocytes were co-incubated with sperm in modified Tris-buffered medium (mTBM) for 5 h and PA was performed using an electric pulse in activation medium. Following this, the embryos were incubated in porcine zygote medium 3 (PZM3). We first tested gene expression level of lineage candidates (internal control; β-actin). In IVF embryos (30, 25, 20, 15, 10, and 5 embryos pooled on Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; replicated 3 times), trophectoderm (TE)-specific genes (Dab2, Gata3) showed peaks on Day 4-5. Within the 2 genes, Dab2 had an earlier peak than Gata3. Inner cell mass (ICM) marker candidates (Nanog, Sox2, and Hnf4a) had diverse patterns. The Nanog and Sox2 genes had peak expression on Day 3. The Nanog expression dropped gradually, but Sox2 dropped suddenly on Day 4. Otherwise, Hnf4a expressed little in Day 3 and expression was sustained from Day 4 to 7. Primitive endoderm markers showed the highest expression on Day 4. We also checked expression level of ICM markers (Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog) in PA embryos (20, 20, 20, 10, and 5 embryos were pooled in 2, 4, 6-8 cells, morula, early, and late blastocyst stages; replicated 3 times). Expression of markers was similar (the highest in the 6-8-cell stage; at least 7.3-, 4.5-, and 3.7-fold compared with the other stages in Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog). We used analysis of variance and Tukey's test for statistical analysis. Following this, we conducted immunocytochemistry with both IVF and PA embryos (20 in each condition). Primary antibodies were treated overnight at 4°C and appropriate secondary antibodies were treated 1 h at room temperature. In the case of IVF, well-known ICM markers (SOX2, OCT4, NANOG, and SOX17) showed restricted distribution in nuclei of ICM cells. However, DAB2 was distributed in the cytoplasm of TE cells. In PA embryos, SOX2 and NANOG distributions were similar to IVF. The OCT4 in ICM cells from morula to early blastocyst was restricted, but not in Day 7 embryos. In conclusion, marker genes showed diverse expression pattern in IVF, but all ICM-specific genes had a similar pattern in PA. Also, ICM marker proteins were restricted in nuclei of ICM cells only except Day 7 PA. Our results provide eye-opening information on marker contribution to lineage specification of porcine embryos. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation in Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1B03032256, NRF-2019R1C1C1004514).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».