82 Stage-specific expression of lineage marker genes and pluripotency marker distribution in porcine pre-implantation embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lineage specification in pre-implantation embryos has been revealed, and it was expedited recently by single cell studies. However, data on expression marker genes and proteins in porcine embryos were still missing. We aimed to investigate the expression and distribution of marker genes and proteins, respectively, in IVF and parthenogenetically activated (PA) embryos. For this, cumulus-free oocytes were co-incubated with sperm in modified Tris-buffered medium (mTBM) for 5 h and PA was performed using an electric pulse in activation medium. Following this, the embryos were incubated in porcine zygote medium 3 (PZM3). We first tested gene expression level of lineage candidates (internal control; β-actin). In IVF embryos (30, 25, 20, 15, 10, and 5 embryos pooled on Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; replicated 3 times), trophectoderm (TE)-specific genes (Dab2, Gata3) showed peaks on Day 4-5. Within the 2 genes, Dab2 had an earlier peak than Gata3. Inner cell mass (ICM) marker candidates (Nanog, Sox2, and Hnf4a) had diverse patterns. The Nanog and Sox2 genes had peak expression on Day 3. The Nanog expression dropped gradually, but Sox2 dropped suddenly on Day 4. Otherwise, Hnf4a expressed little in Day 3 and expression was sustained from Day 4 to 7. Primitive endoderm markers showed the highest expression on Day 4. We also checked expression level of ICM markers (Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog) in PA embryos (20, 20, 20, 10, and 5 embryos were pooled in 2, 4, 6-8 cells, morula, early, and late blastocyst stages; replicated 3 times). Expression of markers was similar (the highest in the 6-8-cell stage; at least 7.3-, 4.5-, and 3.7-fold compared with the other stages in Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog). We used analysis of variance and Tukey's test for statistical analysis. Following this, we conducted immunocytochemistry with both IVF and PA embryos (20 in each condition). Primary antibodies were treated overnight at 4°C and appropriate secondary antibodies were treated 1 h at room temperature. In the case of IVF, well-known ICM markers (SOX2, OCT4, NANOG, and SOX17) showed restricted distribution in nuclei of ICM cells. However, DAB2 was distributed in the cytoplasm of TE cells. In PA embryos, SOX2 and NANOG distributions were similar to IVF. The OCT4 in ICM cells from morula to early blastocyst was restricted, but not in Day 7 embryos. In conclusion, marker genes showed diverse expression pattern in IVF, but all ICM-specific genes had a similar pattern in PA. Also, ICM marker proteins were restricted in nuclei of ICM cells only except Day 7 PA. Our results provide eye-opening information on marker contribution to lineage specification of porcine embryos. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation in Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1B03032256, NRF-2019R1C1C1004514).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".