MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2990213700 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-123275

Less Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Immunosuppressive Therapy and Better Survival after Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Longer Follow-up of a Multicentre Cell Therapy Transplant Canada Randomized Trial

2019· article· en· W2990213700 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Jean Roy, Tony Panzarella, Stephen Couban, Félix Couture, Gerald M. Devins, Mohamed Elemary, S.R. Foley, Geneviève Gallagher, John Kuruvilla, Stephanie J. Lee, John J. Moore, Thomas J. Nevill, Gizelle Popradi, Kirk R. Schultz, David Szwajcer, Cynthia L. Toze, Irwin Walker

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Établissements canadiensCancerCare ManitobaMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalLeukemia & Lymphoma Society of CanadaHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusMcMaster UniversityHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontJuravinski HospitalUniversité LavalBC Children's HospitalDalhousie UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineThymoglobulinGraft-versus-host diseaseTransplantationInternal medicineAnti-thymocyte globulinTacrolimusCumulative incidenceClinical endpointCyclophosphamideHematopoietic stem cell transplantationImmunologySurgeryGastroenterologyRandomized controlled trialChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: We previously reported that pretreatment with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) decreases the use of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and occurrence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) 12 months after allogeneic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors. We hypothesized these benefits would persist beyond 12 months with a positive clinical impact on patients. Methods: Phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial at 10 centres in Canada and one in Australia. Patients aged 16-70 years with a hematological malignancy, a matched (HLA-A, B, C and DRB1) or 1-antigen/allele mismatched unrelated donor were eligible. Myeloablative, nonmyeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning regimens were permitted according to center clinical preference. Patients were randomized to receive or not to receive rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin®, Sanofi Canada) as part of their conditioning. GVHD prophylaxis included either cyclosporine or tacrolimus plus methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. The ATG arm received 0.5, 2.0, 2.0 mg/kg of ATG on days -2, -1 and +1, respectively. Analyses were on a modified intention-to-treat basis for patients actually transplanted. Primary endpoint was freedom from all systemic IST without resumption up to 24 months after transplantation. Secondary endpoints included survival, relapse, non-relapse mortality, incidence and symptoms of chronic GVHD according to Lee scale and quality of life using different questionnaires including the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale. We also aimed to evaluate the recently described endpoints of graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival (GRFS) and chronic graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival (CRFS) in each cohort. This trial was registered at ISRCTN (#29899028) and clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01217723). Results: Between 06/2010 and 07/2013, 203 patients were randomized and 196 available for end-points analysis, including 99 patients in the ATG group and 97 in the No ATG (control) group. Datalock was performed on April 1, 2019. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 24 months was significantly lower in ATG recipients (26.3% versus 41.2%, p=0.032). Similarly, more than twice patients in the ATG group were free from IST at 24 months (adjusted OR of 3.49 [95% CI : 1.60-7.60]; p = 0.002). Most patients retained the same IST status from 12 to 24 months (74.7% in the ATG and 81.4% in the control group). Symptoms of chronic GVHD were also significantly less prevalent in patients receiving ATG, with scores by Lee scale of 13.57 (SE : 1.47) versus 19.90 (SE : 2.15); p=0.017. In contrast, we observed no difference in non-relapse mortality (ATG : 21.2% versus No ATG : 30.9%; p=0.14) and relapse (ATG : 16.2% versus No ATG : 17.5%; p=0.73). Of note, there was no increase in relapse in those receiving either myeloablative or non-myeloablative conditioning (Gray's test p = 0.66 and 0.29, respectively). ATG had a positive impact on survival (Figure 1), with an overall survival at 12 months of 74.8% (SE : 4.4) compared with 64.9% (SE : 4.8) in the control group (adjusted HR 0.56 [95% CI : 0.35-0.90; p=0.017). This benefit of ATG on survival persisted at 24 months, with 70.7% of patients in the ATG group and 53.6% in the control group being alive (p=0.018). GRFS at 12 and 24 months were significantly better in the ATG group, with 45.4% and 37.4% of patients alive and free of ever having had GVHD versus 24.7% and 17.5%, respectively (p = 0.0034). CRFS led to similarly better results in ATG recipients at 12 (57.6%) and 24 (48.5%) months (p=0.01; Figure 2). Depressive symptoms were less frequently reported in the ATG group, the mean CES-D scores being 10.39 (SE : 1.29) compared with 14.63 (SE : 1.48) in the No ATG group (p=0.034). There were no statistically significant differences in other patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Pretreatment with rabbit ATG in combination with standard acute GVHD prophylaxis provides long term benefits consisting of decreases in chronic GVHD incidence, use of IST, depression and improved survival. Our trial is the first to demonstrate both a survival advantage and improvement in quality of life in patients receiving ATG for chronic GVHD prophylaxis. Our data support that ATG should be included in the preparative regimens of all unrelated donor transplant recipients receiving standard acute GVHD prophylaxis. Disclosures Roy: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ExCellThera: Patents & Royalties: Royalties from sales of UM171, Research Funding; Amgen Canada: Honoraria; Janssen Canada: Honoraria; Sanofi Canada: Research Funding. Foley:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Kuruvilla:Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Lee:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Kadmon: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Popradi:Sanofi Canada: Consultancy, Honoraria. Walker:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Grant funding via institution (as a principal investigator). OffLabel Disclosure: Rabbit ATG (Sanofi) for chronic GVHD prophylaxis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,964
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,073

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,003
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,217
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→Travaux en français237 207→