MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2990213700 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-123275

Less Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Immunosuppressive Therapy and Better Survival after Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Longer Follow-up of a Multicentre Cell Therapy Transplant Canada Randomized Trial

2019· article· en· W2990213700 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean Roy, Tony Panzarella, Stephen Couban, Félix Couture, Gerald M. Devins, Mohamed Elemary, S.R. Foley, Geneviève Gallagher, John Kuruvilla, Stephanie J. Lee, John J. Moore, Thomas J. Nevill, Gizelle Popradi, Kirk R. Schultz, David Szwajcer, Cynthia L. Toze, Irwin Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalLeukemia & Lymphoma Society of CanadaHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusMcMaster UniversityHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontJuravinski HospitalUniversité LavalBC Children's HospitalDalhousie UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThymoglobulinGraft-versus-host diseaseTransplantationInternal medicineAnti-thymocyte globulinTacrolimusCumulative incidenceClinical endpointCyclophosphamideHematopoietic stem cell transplantationImmunologySurgeryGastroenterologyRandomized controlled trialChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: We previously reported that pretreatment with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) decreases the use of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and occurrence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) 12 months after allogeneic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors. We hypothesized these benefits would persist beyond 12 months with a positive clinical impact on patients. Methods: Phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial at 10 centres in Canada and one in Australia. Patients aged 16-70 years with a hematological malignancy, a matched (HLA-A, B, C and DRB1) or 1-antigen/allele mismatched unrelated donor were eligible. Myeloablative, nonmyeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning regimens were permitted according to center clinical preference. Patients were randomized to receive or not to receive rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin®, Sanofi Canada) as part of their conditioning. GVHD prophylaxis included either cyclosporine or tacrolimus plus methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. The ATG arm received 0.5, 2.0, 2.0 mg/kg of ATG on days -2, -1 and +1, respectively. Analyses were on a modified intention-to-treat basis for patients actually transplanted. Primary endpoint was freedom from all systemic IST without resumption up to 24 months after transplantation. Secondary endpoints included survival, relapse, non-relapse mortality, incidence and symptoms of chronic GVHD according to Lee scale and quality of life using different questionnaires including the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale. We also aimed to evaluate the recently described endpoints of graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival (GRFS) and chronic graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival (CRFS) in each cohort. This trial was registered at ISRCTN (#29899028) and clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01217723). Results: Between 06/2010 and 07/2013, 203 patients were randomized and 196 available for end-points analysis, including 99 patients in the ATG group and 97 in the No ATG (control) group. Datalock was performed on April 1, 2019. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 24 months was significantly lower in ATG recipients (26.3% versus 41.2%, p=0.032). Similarly, more than twice patients in the ATG group were free from IST at 24 months (adjusted OR of 3.49 [95% CI : 1.60-7.60]; p = 0.002). Most patients retained the same IST status from 12 to 24 months (74.7% in the ATG and 81.4% in the control group). Symptoms of chronic GVHD were also significantly less prevalent in patients receiving ATG, with scores by Lee scale of 13.57 (SE : 1.47) versus 19.90 (SE : 2.15); p=0.017. In contrast, we observed no difference in non-relapse mortality (ATG : 21.2% versus No ATG : 30.9%; p=0.14) and relapse (ATG : 16.2% versus No ATG : 17.5%; p=0.73). Of note, there was no increase in relapse in those receiving either myeloablative or non-myeloablative conditioning (Gray's test p = 0.66 and 0.29, respectively). ATG had a positive impact on survival (Figure 1), with an overall survival at 12 months of 74.8% (SE : 4.4) compared with 64.9% (SE : 4.8) in the control group (adjusted HR 0.56 [95% CI : 0.35-0.90; p=0.017). This benefit of ATG on survival persisted at 24 months, with 70.7% of patients in the ATG group and 53.6% in the control group being alive (p=0.018). GRFS at 12 and 24 months were significantly better in the ATG group, with 45.4% and 37.4% of patients alive and free of ever having had GVHD versus 24.7% and 17.5%, respectively (p = 0.0034). CRFS led to similarly better results in ATG recipients at 12 (57.6%) and 24 (48.5%) months (p=0.01; Figure 2). Depressive symptoms were less frequently reported in the ATG group, the mean CES-D scores being 10.39 (SE : 1.29) compared with 14.63 (SE : 1.48) in the No ATG group (p=0.034). There were no statistically significant differences in other patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Pretreatment with rabbit ATG in combination with standard acute GVHD prophylaxis provides long term benefits consisting of decreases in chronic GVHD incidence, use of IST, depression and improved survival. Our trial is the first to demonstrate both a survival advantage and improvement in quality of life in patients receiving ATG for chronic GVHD prophylaxis. Our data support that ATG should be included in the preparative regimens of all unrelated donor transplant recipients receiving standard acute GVHD prophylaxis. Disclosures Roy: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ExCellThera: Patents & Royalties: Royalties from sales of UM171, Research Funding; Amgen Canada: Honoraria; Janssen Canada: Honoraria; Sanofi Canada: Research Funding. Foley:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Kuruvilla:Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Lee:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Kadmon: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Popradi:Sanofi Canada: Consultancy, Honoraria. Walker:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Grant funding via institution (as a principal investigator). OffLabel Disclosure: Rabbit ATG (Sanofi) for chronic GVHD prophylaxis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→