MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2990232535 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-121996

Loss of Phospholipase C Gamma 1 (PLCG1) Impairs AML1-ETO Induced Leukemia Stem Cell Self-Renewal

2019· article· en· W2990232535 sur OpenAlexaff
Tina M. Schnoeder, Adrian Schwarzer, Florian Perner, Joanna Kirkpatrick, Anna Dolnik, Konstanze Döhner, Patricia Arreba-Tutusaus, Salam A. Assi, Claudia Bruedigam, Carolin Kathner, Theresa Eifert, Marcus Buschbeck, Monica Nafria i Fedi, Anetta Ptasinska, Andrew G. Elefanty, Elizabeth S. Ng, Holger Bierhoff, Georg Matziolis, Klaus‐Dieter Fischer, Olaf Heidenreich, Steven Lane, Lars Bullinger, Björn von Eyß, Alessandro Ori‬‬, Constanze Bonifer, Florian H. Heidel

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensMcGill University Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyStem cellCancer researchLeukemiaEmbryonic stem cellMyeloid leukemiaFusion proteinImmunologyCell biologyGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chromosomal translocations found in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can generate oncogenic fusions with aberrant epigenetic and transcriptional functions. However, direct therapeutic targeting of leukemia fusion proteins has not been accomplished so far. Although high remission rates can be induced in patients diagnosed with AML1-ETO/t(8;21)-positive AML only half of them achieve long-term disease-free survival (Papaemmanuiel et al., NEJM, 2016). In the other half of these patients, the disease maintaining leukemia stem cell (LSC) clone is not eliminated by chemotherapy. A functional characteristic of LSCs is unlimited self-renewal capacity and several signaling pathways have been identified that maintain stem cell self-renewal. Targeting the oncogene induced self-renewal capacity of LSCs has great potential to eliminate the malignant clone and prevent relapse. To identify oncogenic cellular functions with relevance for LSC self-renewal, we performed global proteome profiling in murine AML1-ETO9a (AE) compared to MLL-AF9 (MA9) driven LSCs. Gene set enrichment analyses revealed a significant enrichment of calcium-dependent cellular functions and Phospholipase C (PLC)-signaling in AE LSCs. These data could be confirmed in sorted CD34+ blasts from AE-positive AML when compared to non-AE-AML. All PLC family members are regulators of Ca2+ homeostasis. However, when analyzing published AML gene expression datasets we found exclusively PLCG1 to be highly expressed in t(8;21) AML. Conditional activation of AE in embryonic stem cells resulted in induction of PLCG1 expression and PLCG1 was identified as a direct target of the AE fusion by ChIP-sequencing in AE-positive Kasumi-1 cells.Here, PLCG1 depletion resulted in reduced Ca2+ release, impaired proliferation and reduced colony formation in vitro. In a xenograft model, inactivation of PLCG1 resulted not only in delayed disease development (median survival shNT vs. shPLCG1: 135 days vs. not reached, p=0.02) but also in reduction of disease penetrance by 87%. Consistent with these results, transcriptome analysis revealed strong induction of gene sets related to myeloid differentiation and down-regulation of gene sets linked to proliferation, stemness and c-Myc targets. To confirm the functional role of PLCG1-signaling in AE-driven LSCs, we generated a new conditional knockout mouse model for Plcg1 and induced leukemia using the oncogenes AE and KRAS-G12D (AE/K). Genetic inactivation of Plcg1in vivo after engraftment of leukemic cells resulted in significant reduction of LSC numbers (p=0.04) and a reduction of disease penetrance by 67% in primary recipients. Isolated LSCs revealed induction of differentiation, loss of cell cycle activity and failed to re-establish disease in secondary recipients (Plcg1+/+ vs. Plcg1-/-: median survival 12 days vs. not reached; p=0.0001). In contrast, genetic deletion of Plcg1 appeared to be dispensable for normal murine HSC function during primary and secondary transplantation. Primary human t(8;21) AML cells (derived from 4 different donors) showed impaired colony forming capacity following PLCG1 inactivation in vitro irrespective of co-occurring mutations while colony formation of human CD34+ BM cells was not affected to a major extent. As Ca2+ signaling appeared deregulated in t(8;21) AML, we aimed to investigate the effects of pharmacologic Ca2+ inhibition as a tractable target downstream of PLCG1. To assess specifically for LSC function, we treated primary recipient mice with established AE/K-driven leukemia with the clinically approved calcineurin inhibitor ciclosporin (CsA), a compound that blocks intracellular Ca2+ release. CsA-treated animals showed reduction in total leukemic burden (spleen weight diluent vs. CsA, p=0.01) and LSC numbers (p=0.02). This resulted in increased survival of secondary recipient hosts (diluent vs. CsA: median 15 vs. 29 days, p=0.0002). These effects could not be observed for other oncogenes (e.g. MA9), confirming its specificity for AE-induced disease. Consistently, CsA treated primary human t(8;21)-positive AML blasts failed to form colonies in methylcellulose. In summary, our findings identified PLCG1-dependent Ca2+ signaling as a critical pathway for t(8;21) LSC maintenance and self-renewal. Most importantly, as PLCG1 is dispensable for maintenance of normal HSPCs, PLCG1 could serve as a novel therapeutic target in t(8;21) AML. Disclosures Döhner: Daiichi: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bullinger:Novartis: Honoraria; Menarini: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Hexal: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Bayer: Other: Financing of scientific research; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,240 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→