MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2990468941

Pediatric Neuropsychological Intervention Scott J. Hunter and Jacobus Donders, Eds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2007. 493 pp. US $115.00.

2009· article· en· W2990468941 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harry N. Bawden

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed Central · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychological interventionNeuropsychologyIntervention (counseling)PsychologyAutismNeuropsychological assessmentPsychiatryClinical psychologyPsychotherapistCognition
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This edited book will be of interest to child psychiatrists. The title was somewhat misleading because the interventions reviewed were much broader than neuropsychological interventions. For example, Thomas Owley reviewed the use of pharmacological interventions for autism spectrum disorders in order to demonstrate concepts relevant to the pharmacological treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders. In fact, the book mainly reviewed a variety of intervention strategies, including behavioural and pharmacological treatments, for children and adolescents with disorders such as traumatic brain injury, seizures, cancer, motor control and movement disorders, autism spectrum disorders, learning disabilities, genetic syndromes, right hemispheric disorders, dysexecutive disorders, and attentional disorders typically seen by pediatric neuropsychologists and child psychiatrists. It was a scholarly work, and not a description of manualized interventions. Historically, neuropsychology has focussed on assessment issues in order to elucidate brain-behaviour relationships. This emphasis was still apparent in this book, despite the stated focus on intervention, which was a reflection of the current state of affairs. For example, diagnostic and assessment issues as well as descriptions of neuropsychological sequelae were included in the chapters on the various disorders. The first section of the book reviewed fundamental issues related to clinical practice including the importance of using a developmental approach, the role of neuropsychological assessment in diagnosis and treatment planning, and multicultural issues relevant to intervention and rehabilitation. The chapter on relationship of neuropsychological practice with educational interventions will be of less interest to Canadian clinicians because it was focussed on American legislation affecting provision of special education services. The second section of the book described specific neurodevelopmental disorders including their clinical manifestations, neuropsychological findings, and results of intervention studies. With respect to intervention studies, most work has been on the treatment of children with learning disabilities and attentional disorders. This was reflected in the comprehensiveness of these chapters. The short section on psychosocial interventions for cancer patients and their families was especially interesting. The third section of the book was an assortment of chapters on rehabilitative interventions, quantitative electroencephalography and neurofeedback, which could be considered as an acquired taste, pharmacological interventions for autism, and neuroimaging. Erin Bigler presented several interesting cases in which results of several types of neuroimaging techniques were related to history and neuropsychological assessment findings. The colour images were useful, but unfortunately the images were rather small, with the figure legends sometimes taking up more space than the images. This timely review of intervention efforts should be mandatory reading for paediatric neuropsychologists. Since there is considerable overlap in the types of patients seen by child psychiatrists and paediatric neuropsychologists, the information will be of interest to child psychiatrists who are looking for up-to-date information on specific neurodevelopmental disorders. I look forward to future editions that hopefully will contain considerably more information on intervention strategies than is currently available.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,080
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed CentralMême sujetAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderTravaux en français237 207