MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990468941

Pediatric Neuropsychological Intervention Scott J. Hunter and Jacobus Donders, Eds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2007. 493 pp. US $115.00.

2009· article· en· W2990468941 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harry N. Bawden

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionNeuropsychologyIntervention (counseling)PsychologyAutismNeuropsychological assessmentPsychiatryClinical psychologyPsychotherapistCognition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This edited book will be of interest to child psychiatrists. The title was somewhat misleading because the interventions reviewed were much broader than neuropsychological interventions. For example, Thomas Owley reviewed the use of pharmacological interventions for autism spectrum disorders in order to demonstrate concepts relevant to the pharmacological treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders. In fact, the book mainly reviewed a variety of intervention strategies, including behavioural and pharmacological treatments, for children and adolescents with disorders such as traumatic brain injury, seizures, cancer, motor control and movement disorders, autism spectrum disorders, learning disabilities, genetic syndromes, right hemispheric disorders, dysexecutive disorders, and attentional disorders typically seen by pediatric neuropsychologists and child psychiatrists. It was a scholarly work, and not a description of manualized interventions. Historically, neuropsychology has focussed on assessment issues in order to elucidate brain-behaviour relationships. This emphasis was still apparent in this book, despite the stated focus on intervention, which was a reflection of the current state of affairs. For example, diagnostic and assessment issues as well as descriptions of neuropsychological sequelae were included in the chapters on the various disorders. The first section of the book reviewed fundamental issues related to clinical practice including the importance of using a developmental approach, the role of neuropsychological assessment in diagnosis and treatment planning, and multicultural issues relevant to intervention and rehabilitation. The chapter on relationship of neuropsychological practice with educational interventions will be of less interest to Canadian clinicians because it was focussed on American legislation affecting provision of special education services. The second section of the book described specific neurodevelopmental disorders including their clinical manifestations, neuropsychological findings, and results of intervention studies. With respect to intervention studies, most work has been on the treatment of children with learning disabilities and attentional disorders. This was reflected in the comprehensiveness of these chapters. The short section on psychosocial interventions for cancer patients and their families was especially interesting. The third section of the book was an assortment of chapters on rehabilitative interventions, quantitative electroencephalography and neurofeedback, which could be considered as an acquired taste, pharmacological interventions for autism, and neuroimaging. Erin Bigler presented several interesting cases in which results of several types of neuroimaging techniques were related to history and neuropsychological assessment findings. The colour images were useful, but unfortunately the images were rather small, with the figure legends sometimes taking up more space than the images. This timely review of intervention efforts should be mandatory reading for paediatric neuropsychologists. Since there is considerable overlap in the types of patients seen by child psychiatrists and paediatric neuropsychologists, the information will be of interest to child psychiatrists who are looking for up-to-date information on specific neurodevelopmental disorders. I look forward to future editions that hopefully will contain considerably more information on intervention strategies than is currently available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207