Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Open access (OA) has been gaining momentum in the world of scholarly publication for the past 15 years. An article published with the OA model is freely accessible to the public—i.e., it does not sit behind a publisher’s “pay wall.” This movement has been fueled in large part by governmental funders of research who believe that the published product of their support should be available without charge to the entire research community and to the public who provided the funding. To cover the costs of the editorial/peer-review process in the OA model, authors (or their institution) pay an article processing charge (APC), averaging $2,000 to $5,000. This fee is often included in federal or foundation grants that authors receive to conduct their research. After a lengthy period of discussion by the JBJS Editorial Board and Board of Trustees, we are pleased to announce the launch of JBJS Open Access. This new, online-only journal will expand our ability to publish basic-science and clinical findings as well as new research approaches that have the potential of impacting musculoskeletal disease and injury care worldwide. We believe that this journal option will be of greatest interest to authors from non-North American regions, where the OA funding mandate is quite strong. JBJS Open Access manuscripts will undergo the same rigorous peer review for which JBJS is known. This will be overseen by newly appointed Co-editors Dr. Eng Lee from Singapore and Dr. Robin Richards from Canada, both highly experienced basic and clinical science investigators who possess over 60 years of combined experience in scholarly publication activities. In addition, all accepted papers will undergo the same extensive copy-editing process that is provided for all JBJS publications. The APC for publication in JBJS Open Access has been set at $2,250. This fee will be collected after acceptance and will have no influence on the editorial decision-making process for a manuscript. JBJS is excited to be able to offer JBJS Open Access as one more step in our continuing effort to meet our authors’ and readers’ evolving needs. We are proud that authors will now have an OA publication option while receiving the outstanding services and brand of excellence that JBJS has been providing its authors for over 125 years—and that a wider audience of readers will have access to the best in orthopaedic information.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,076 | 0,254 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,076 | 0,215 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,425 | 0,042 |
| Science ouverte | 0,248 | 0,235 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle