MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2991436030 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-130362

Enasidenib Plus Azacitidine Significantly Improves Complete Remission and Overall Response Compared with Azacitidine Alone in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) Mutations: Interim Phase II Results from an Ongoing, Randomized Study

2019· article· en· W2991436030 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Courtney D. DiNardo, Andre C. Schuh, Eytan M. Stein, Pau Montesinos Fernández, Andrew H. Wei, Stéphane de Botton, Amer M. Zeidan, Amir T. Fathi, Lynn Quek, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Mark G. Frattini, Frederik Lersch, Jing Gong, Aleksandra Franovic, Kyle J. MacBeth, Paresh Vyas, Hartmut Döhner

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAzacitidineIDH2Isocitrate dehydrogenaseMedicineMyeloid leukemiaInternal medicineInterimComplete remissionInterim analysisOncologyLeukemiaIDH1GastroenterologyClinical trialBiologyMutationChemotherapyEnzymeGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Mutations in IDH2 occur in 8-19% of patients (pts) with AML. Enasidenib (ENA; AG-221) is an oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH2 (mIDH2) that promotes myeloid cell differentiation. ENA is approved in the US for use in adult pts with relapsed/refractory mIDH2 AML. Azacitidine (AZA) is a hypomethylating agent that prolongs survival vs. conventional care regimens in older unfit pts with newly diagnosed (ND) AML. AZA promotes DNA hypomethylation by inhibiting DNA methyltransferases. ENA indirectly reduces DNA methylation by suppressing the oncometabolite, 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), thereby restoring function to α-ketoglutarate-dependent TET family enzymes, among other substrates. In vitro, combination ENA + AZA enhances cell differentiation. This is the first report of interim outcomes from the randomized, phase II portion of an ongoing, open-label, phase I/II study of ENA + AZA vs. AZA monotherapy (AZA-only) in pts with mIDH2 ND-AML who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy (IC) (NCT02677922). Methods: Adult pts with mIDH2 ND-AML who were ineligible to receive IC and had ECOG PS scores ≤2 were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive ENA + AZA or AZA-only in repeated 28-day cycles. All pts receive SC AZA 75 mg/m2/day for the first 7 days of each treatment (Tx) cycle; pts randomized to ENA + AZA also receive continuous ENA 100 mg QD. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR), which includes complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete blood or platelet count recovery (CRi/CRp), partial remission (PR), and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), per modified IWG 2003 AML response criteria. P values for response comparisons between Tx arms were derived using chi-square test. Duration of response (DOR) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. mIDH2 variant allele frequencies (VAF) in bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) were assessed by digital PCR. Results: Between Oct. 2016 and Aug. 2018, 101 pts were randomized to receive ENA + AZA (n=68) or AZA-only (n=33). Median ages were 74 years (range 62-85) in the ENA + AZA arm and 75 years (57-85) in the AZA-only arm. Among pts with available data, 78% in the ENA + AZA arm (43/55) and 90% (19/21) in the AZA-only arm had intermediate-risk cytogenetics, respectively, and 18% and 10% had poor-risk cytogenetics. At data cutoff (Feb. 2019), 39 pts were still receiving their randomized Tx. Most common reasons for study discontinuation in the ENA + AZA and AZA-only arms were death (31% and 27%, respectively) and pt decision (4% and 12%). Two pts in the ENA + AZA arm and 1 pt in the AZA-only arm proceeded to transplant. Median number of Tx cycles was 8 (range 1-24) in the ENA + AZA arm and 6 (1-22) in the AZA-only arm; 27% and 19% of pts, respectively, received ≥12 Tx cycles. Response rates were significantly higher with combination treatment vs. AZA alone: ORRs were 68% vs. 42%, respectively (P=0.0155), and CR rates were 50% vs. 12% (P=0.0002) (Table). Median DOR was not reached with ENA + AZA and was 10.2 months in the AZA-only arm (P=0.13). Maximal mIDH2 VAF suppression from baseline was significantly greater with ENA + AZA vs. AZA-only (median -69.3% vs. -14.1%, respectively; P=0.0004). Tx-related grade 3-4 adverse events occurring in ≥10% of pts in the combination arm were neutropenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (34%), anemia (21%), febrile neutropenia (12%), and IDH differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS; 10%); these events occurred in 19%, 19%, 22%, 13%, and 0% of pts in the AZA-only arm. Rate of Tx-related grade 3-4 infections was 16% in the ENA + AZA arm and 31% in the AZA-only arm. In all, 12 pts (18%) in the ENA + AZA arm experienced IDH-DS (any grade) at a median of 37 days. In the first 60 days, 5 deaths (7%) were reported in the ENA + AZA arm (3 due to infectious complications and 2 due to possible IDH-DS) and 1 death (3%) was reported in the AZA-only arm due to progressive disease. Conclusions: ENA + AZA was associated with significantly improved complete remission and overall response rates and significant mIDH2 VAF reductions compared with AZA-only. Combination Tx was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that reported for either monotherapy. An updated data cutoff that includes at least 1 year of follow-up for all pts will be presented at the conference. Updated data will include overall survival, event-free survival, and comprehensive analyses of 2-HG and co-mutation dynamics. Disclosures DiNardo: syros: Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; medimmune: Honoraria; agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; daiichi sankyo: Honoraria; notable labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schuh:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stein:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fernandez:Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Wei:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: AHW is a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and receives a fraction of its royalty stream related to venetoclax, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Macrogenics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. De Botton:Novartis: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Pierre Fabre: Consultancy; Daiichi: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy; Syros: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Forma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding. Zeidan:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Cardinal Health: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; BeyondSpring: Honoraria; Medimmune/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Resea

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,123
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations45
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207