MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2992524461

Introduction to This Issue

2006· article· en· W2992524461 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Nelson Bolles

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Career Planning and Adult Development Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMeaning (existential)Power (physics)SpiritualityCoachingSociologyFacet (psychology)PsychologyPsychoanalysisPhilosophyEpistemologyPersonality
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Things are not always what they seem. Though I am nominally the Guest Editor of this Special Issue of the Journal, is actually Steven Beasley who did the patient, day-by-day, step-by-step legwork that resulted in getting an extraordinary bunch of authors to write about The Impact of Spirituality and Personal Values on One's Career. We will always need a bunch of authors, and not just one or two, to write on this topic. As the poem about The Blind Men and the Elephant by the American poet John Godfrey Saxe reminds us, each of us sees a different facet of the topic, and is only when we put all our perceptions together that we have an accurate sense of the whole. You can gather from the Table of Contents which facet each of our authors has elected to write upon. But, to elaborate (briefly): Ken Blanchard, author of The One Minute Manager, writes of his collaboration with Norman Vincent Peale on their book, The Power of Ethical Management: You Don't Have to Cheat to Win. He concluded that leaders who were seeking to find meaning in their lives might want to move from success to significance in their own companies by operating and leading them in a different way. Hence, his article is titled: You Can Find Significance Where You Are Planted. Rabbi Moshe Fine, of Cleveland, Ohio, writes of Career Spirituality. Rabbi Fine, who is also a lawyer and career coach, recently completed Dick Knowdell's workshop on coaching individuals through career transition. He writes of his perspective on coaching with spirituality, and about how spirituality enables life to have meaning. Bob Snclling, founder of Snelling & Snelling, and of Resumes by Ross, in his article Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Proved that Non-Violent Protest Works, calls for nation-wide non-violent resistance to the anti-religious secularization trend in the United States. The late Larry Gaffin (and we miss him!), author of The Spirituality of Work: Purpose Beyond the Paycheck, in his article Spirituality That Works, described his program at the Center for Life Decisions, a career counseling program with spirituality at its core in Seattle, Washington. Tim Elliott, of Toronto, Canada, was a congregational minister for 25 years. In Clarity and Courage, he describes his learning through the doctoral program at the University of Toronto of work and vocation, and how to develop a pastoral guidance program. He now counsels people on their vocational and career transitions, and in the article he describes the questions one is asking and not asking, realizing what is clear and not clear, and reflecting on gifts of and need for courage to move forward. Sherry Connolly and Dick Cappon, of Toronto, Canada, write in You're Being Called...are You Listening? that it is the calling that is the essence of work, career, job. The calling anchors our work life. It validates career direction and provides the clarity and confidence that a chosen career path is right for me because is expressing my best self and is fulfilling my personal call. Arthur F. Miller, co-author of Finding a Job You Can Love, in his article The Integration of Spirituality with Vocation, tells of the designed giftedness in each of us, and how we can use our special gifts to express our spirituality in work and life. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,631
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,526

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0080,005
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,6310,490

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Career Planning and Adult Development JournalMême sujetWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipTravaux en français237 207