"Making Space": Lessons from Collaborations with Tribal Nations
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In light of critiques regarding the concept of service, and after highlighting limits of critical servicelearning and “authentic” relationship approaches, this article presents “making space” for marginalized community perspectives as an alternative metaphor for conceptualizing university-community relationships. Drawing upon multiple experiences with American Indian tribal nations, the article identifies deeply intercultural, counterhegemonic, and decolonizing dynamics enacted through making space, and which produce a discomforting reversal of the common analytic focus on community service recipients. Making space also enables university-community alignment, the generation of projects truly based in community interests, and facilitates interactions outside and disruptive of hegemonic power/knowledge regimes and discourses. The field of service-learning, increasingly supported as a common element of higher education, faces a range of questions about its nature, practice, and theory. Central among these is the very notion of service itself, the types of experience it entails, and students’ relationship to those being served. While service-learning takes some inspiration from Deweyian educational theory that emphasizes problematic and disruptive situations as the origin of inquiry (Dewey, 1916; Garrison 1996, p. 16), and originated in first-generation learning experiences that were frequently only semi-structured and “messy” (Stanton, Giles, & Cruz 1999), much current service-learning appears to be highly structured and orderly. As service-learning increasingly refers to volunteer experiences touted as community service by colleges and universities, the nature of service, and the action and relationships involved in service, are worthy of ongoing debate and discussion. This article does not attempt to craft a new definition of service, however, or parse the multitude of definitions that have been introduced and reviewed elsewhere. Rather, through this article I aim to contribute to the theorization of “service” by problematizing common understandings of service and action while promoting the notion of “making space” as one alternative (Regan, 2010). Making space, a concept drawn from reconciliation efforts involving the Canadian government and First Nations (Regan), is consistent with and extends the growing emphasis within the existing service-learning literature on both “critical” service-learning and sustained community-university relationships. My discussion of the making space metaphor and its potential are based in my participant-observation in communitybased collaborations with Indigenous Nations, interviews with university and tribal participants in such
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle