MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2993204684

Perception towards Internet Advertising: A Study with Reference to Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata

2014· article· en· W2993204684 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAdvances In Management · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineDecision Sciences
ThématiqueTechnology's Impact on Media
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAdvertisingThe InternetRevenueOnline advertisingBusinessQuarter (Canadian coin)Advertising campaignAdvertising researchContextual advertisingMarketingGeographyComputer scienceFinanceWorld Wide Web
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

AbstractOne of the most significant developments to affect advertising worldwide in 21st century has been the development of internet as a medium of mass communication. As a communication tool, internet is emerging as a new challenge to mass media advertising. As a result of this, many advertising companies are modifying their traditional techniques to cater to a wider range of public. Internet has enormous potential as an advertising medium because internet offers many advantages over traditional media. The potential of internet advertising is vast as the audience of it is genuinely global. Previous studies have shown certain types of internet advertising are very effective.Keywords: Internet Advertising, Purchase, Metro Cities.IntroductionInternet advertising is a very fast moving area. The techniques and formats used to advertise are changing constantly as advertisers try to adapt to this medium. Projections for the financial growth of Internet advertising are going up year by year.U.S. Internet advertising revenues hit $6.4 billion in the third quarter of 2010, internet advertising revenues in the U.S. hit $7.88 billion for the third quarter of 2011, representing a 22 percent increase over the same period in 2010. In the first half of 2012, internet advertising revenues climbed to an all-time high of $17 billion, representing a 14 percent increase year-over-year. At $9.6 billion, first quarter of 2013 digital advertising revenues in the U.S. hit landmark numbers, according to a survey conducted by the Interactive Advertising Bureau IAB, 2013. The figure is a 15.6 percent increase over the $8.3 billion figure reported in the first quarter 2012. This huge spending figure illustrates that marketers recognize that internet advertising has become one of the leading Medias for marketers to promote their products.Indian internet advertising market is expected to reach 2,938 crore by March 2014 as per latest report released by Internet and Mobile Association of India and IMRB International. Group M (2012) report states that the internet advertising market, comprising of search, display, mobile, social media, email and video advertising, has grown by 29 percent year over year to 2,260 crore by March, 2013. It was valued at INR 1,750 crore in financial year 2011-12. Share of digital marketing spend of the total Indian advertising spend was 7% in 2012. The number of Internet users in India is expected to nearly triple from 125 million in 2011 to 330 million by 2016, says a report by Boston Consulting Group (BCG). This rise in Internet penetration will lead an increase in digital influence on people's purchase decisions.Review of LiteratureWhile advertisers were generally keen to use the Web to communicate product information, they were concerned about security/privacy and uncertain how to measure the effectiveness of Internet advertising. Website managers perceived the Web to be a cost effective means of advertising, well-suited for conveying information, precipitating action and creating brand/product image, awareness and objectives. However, it was seen as ineffective for stimulating emotions or getting attention. If we turn to users' perceptions, Ducoffe7 studied the attitudes of 318 business users to Web advertising and reported that it was perceived as more informative than valuable or entertaining. Respondents were asked to rank seven media in terms of their value as a source of advertising.Schlosser et al19 found wide variation among Internet users' attitudes towards Internet advertising. Equal numbers of respondents liked, disliked and felt neutral towards it. Enjoyment of looking at web advertisements contributed more than the informativeness or utility of the ad towards consumer attitudes towards web advertising. This finding was mirrored by the responses of a demographically weighted-to-match sample who answered questions on advertising in general, showing that the reported perceptions of Internet advertising were not just a reflection of the demographics of Internet users. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,915
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,539

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,388
Écart entre enseignants0,344 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle