MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2993277217

Trade Liberalization and Market Competitiveness of the Colombian Apparel Industry

2002· article· en· W2993277217 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jerry Haar, Sylvia F. Garza Reyes

Notice bibliographique

RevueMultinational Business Review · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLiberalizationEconomicsFree tradeSummitInternational tradeInternational economicsEconomic liberalizationGlobalizationMarket economy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The liberalization of Colombia's economy, accelerated by former President Cesar Gaviria's apertura (opening) process in 1990, has achieved a number of far-reaching reforms that have positively impacted the sector. Using the apparel industry as a case study, the authors determine the degree to which Colombia has pursued (public policy facilitation) versus (market forces alone) strategies of economic adjustment and liberalization. In addition, they analyze the political and economic variables that have shaped Colombia's global competitiveness in textiles and apparel. The symbiotic dynamism among macro and microeconomic reforms, liberalization, and the compelling forces of globalization are altering the content, shape, and pace of Latin American development and the region's extraregional relationships. Given the great significance of the first Summit of the Americas in 1994 and the agreement to forge a Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) by 2005, trade (implying finance, investment, and commerce as well) has emerged as the centerpiece for economic development and advancement in the Americas. This article presents and analyzes the intersection of the above-mentioned developments, as illustrated within one country Colombia -- and within one industry in that country -- the apparel industry -- in order to illuminate how both selected public policy choices and external factors impact economic competitiveness. The authors also seek to determine, using the apparel industry example, the degree to which Colombia has pursued a versus a strategy of economic adjustment and liberalization (Wise 1999). The competitive approach actively utilizes a range of public policies to facilitate adjustment and correct for any failures or shortcomings of the market (for example, the strategy used in Chile), whereas the standard strategy assigns the task of economic adjustment to market forces alone (for example, the case of Argentina). The article also documents the strategic and managerial response of the apparel industry to local, regional and global change. Trade Liberalization. Prior to the 1980s, market economies with minimal state intervention and liberal democracies were the exception and not the rule worldwide. In the 1980s, the process of transnationalization and increasing interdependence, along with the revival of liberal (orthodox) capitalism, created the opportunity and the necessity to establish liberal economic regimes -- not only in the advanced industrial nations but also in those countries where democratization had not been a prerequisite for economic growth and stability. Through the 1990s, an outward-oriented model of expanded in the Western Hemisphere, as cited above. Essentially, Latin American policymakers have relied on one of two models of economic and development. As Carol Wise (1999) points out, the first is a standard approach (mentioned previously in the cases of Mexico, Argentina, and Peru), whereby market forces direct the adjustment and competitive liberalization policies are implemented. The second is a competitive approach (as taken in Chile), in which countries use public policy in the process of adjustment -- for example, tax and credit incentives for smaller trading companies, export promotion, and job training programs. By exerting a leading role, the state actively establishes a developmental model for institutionalizing the liberalization process. Regional and subregional integration in the Western Hemisphere have increased, widened, and deepened during the last two decades. In the mid-1980s, Argentina and Brazil initiated negotiations for what would become the Southern Common Market (Mercado Comun del Sur -- MERCOSUR) Agreement that came into effect in 1995. In 1994, Canada, Mexico, and the United States created the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the world's largest free area; members of the Andean Group solidified their trading arrangements; and, in subsequent years, more than two dozen bilateral and multilateral accords have proliferated throughout the Western Hemisphere. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,293
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,588

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMultinational Business ReviewMême sujetGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactTravaux en français237 207