MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993277217

Trade Liberalization and Market Competitiveness of the Colombian Apparel Industry

2002· article· en· W2993277217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jerry Haar, Sylvia F. Garza Reyes

Bibliographic record

VenueMultinational Business Review · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberalizationEconomicsFree tradeSummitInternational tradeInternational economicsEconomic liberalizationGlobalizationMarket economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The liberalization of Colombia's economy, accelerated by former President Cesar Gaviria's apertura (opening) process in 1990, has achieved a number of far-reaching reforms that have positively impacted the sector. Using the apparel industry as a case study, the authors determine the degree to which Colombia has pursued (public policy facilitation) versus (market forces alone) strategies of economic adjustment and liberalization. In addition, they analyze the political and economic variables that have shaped Colombia's global competitiveness in textiles and apparel. The symbiotic dynamism among macro and microeconomic reforms, liberalization, and the compelling forces of globalization are altering the content, shape, and pace of Latin American development and the region's extraregional relationships. Given the great significance of the first Summit of the Americas in 1994 and the agreement to forge a Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) by 2005, trade (implying finance, investment, and commerce as well) has emerged as the centerpiece for economic development and advancement in the Americas. This article presents and analyzes the intersection of the above-mentioned developments, as illustrated within one country Colombia -- and within one industry in that country -- the apparel industry -- in order to illuminate how both selected public policy choices and external factors impact economic competitiveness. The authors also seek to determine, using the apparel industry example, the degree to which Colombia has pursued a versus a strategy of economic adjustment and liberalization (Wise 1999). The competitive approach actively utilizes a range of public policies to facilitate adjustment and correct for any failures or shortcomings of the market (for example, the strategy used in Chile), whereas the standard strategy assigns the task of economic adjustment to market forces alone (for example, the case of Argentina). The article also documents the strategic and managerial response of the apparel industry to local, regional and global change. Trade Liberalization. Prior to the 1980s, market economies with minimal state intervention and liberal democracies were the exception and not the rule worldwide. In the 1980s, the process of transnationalization and increasing interdependence, along with the revival of liberal (orthodox) capitalism, created the opportunity and the necessity to establish liberal economic regimes -- not only in the advanced industrial nations but also in those countries where democratization had not been a prerequisite for economic growth and stability. Through the 1990s, an outward-oriented model of expanded in the Western Hemisphere, as cited above. Essentially, Latin American policymakers have relied on one of two models of economic and development. As Carol Wise (1999) points out, the first is a standard approach (mentioned previously in the cases of Mexico, Argentina, and Peru), whereby market forces direct the adjustment and competitive liberalization policies are implemented. The second is a competitive approach (as taken in Chile), in which countries use public policy in the process of adjustment -- for example, tax and credit incentives for smaller trading companies, export promotion, and job training programs. By exerting a leading role, the state actively establishes a developmental model for institutionalizing the liberalization process. Regional and subregional integration in the Western Hemisphere have increased, widened, and deepened during the last two decades. In the mid-1980s, Argentina and Brazil initiated negotiations for what would become the Southern Common Market (Mercado Comun del Sur -- MERCOSUR) Agreement that came into effect in 1995. In 1994, Canada, Mexico, and the United States created the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the world's largest free area; members of the Andean Group solidified their trading arrangements; and, in subsequent years, more than two dozen bilateral and multilateral accords have proliferated throughout the Western Hemisphere. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultinational Business ReviewSame topicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactFrench-language works237,207