MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2994110787

A Harmless Forgery

2007· article· en· W2994110787 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Howard Norman

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Conradian : the Journal of the Joseph Conrad Society · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueJoseph Conrad and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnecdoteHistoryMedicineClassicsLiteraturePsychologyArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

JOSEPH CONRAD is the author whose novels I re-read most often. Enough said about my reading life. Here is my only Conrad anecdote. In February 1977, I arrived from Baffin Island in the pale Arctic via Winnipeg to Halifax, Nova Scotia. From the airport I went directly to hospital. I knew that something was terribly wrong with me. It felt as if a hundred pound anvil was in my chest. I was fairly gasping for breath. Within an hour my left lung collapsed. Also, I was diagnosed as having pneumonia. In hospital I had an edition of Conrad's letters. In one he'd written to a friend about a mutual acquaintance (paraphrased), Donald, at the of tuberculosis as he is. The word gates struck me as operatic, almost religious prescience, foreshadowing a point in time and space Donald would eventually cross over into the afterlife. Anyway, the letters made a fine companion. I didn't know a soul in Halifax. My stay in hospital was ten days, during which medications kept me from the of complications from pneumonia, which the poor fellow, forty-four years my senior, in the neighbouring room, succumbed to. To the accompaniment of his percussive cough, I scarcely slept.All of was preface, however, to a small incident that offered me a chance to come to some knowledge of my decided limitations as an ethical person. Discharged with instructions from a stern doctor of how to build up my stamina and wind, I checked into the Lord Nelson hotel. I slept much of the next three or four days, then took a morning walk in the city. In a used and antiquarian bookshop I found a hardcover copy of The secret Agent. Mint condition, to my eye. What's it appeared to be actually signed by Conrad. There was his cursive signature on the title-page of first English edition. The price, written in pencil, was ten dollars. Now, to a person comporting himself with dignity, discovery may have prompted the question, Perhaps on closer inspection you'd care to sell book for more than ten dollars ... Surely was an oversight. I should say something to the owner, Mr Albert Moraigne. Yet within a moment's time I began to rationalize my choice not to bring Conrad's signature to anyone's attention. Someone in the shop indeed should have studied the book more carefully. That's their profession, after all. To rationalize further, I vowed, come hell or high water, I'd never sell the book in hand. Further yet, I had about thirty dollars to my name. (I was waiting for a cheque for some travel writing.) Therefore I was about to spend a third of my net worth. I delivered the book to the front desk.If I'm correct, I said, this will cost me ten dollars.The clerk, a woman in her late thirties, glanced at the first page and said, You're absolutely correct. Lovely book.I'd have thought a first edition would cost more, I said.Registering the sale in a ledger, today something of an antique process, she said, It's been marked down, actually.Oh, why is that? I said.The signature is a forgery, she said, matter-of-factly. ccYou see, a first edition like would be, even without a signature, worth a healthy sum. But with a forged signature, it's simply - how to say it? - 'soiled.' Do you still want it?Yes, I said.Good, she said. However, I was obliged to bring the signature to a customer's attention.She wrapped the novel in flowery paper and sealed it with Scotch tape.Looking to my right and up a winding staircase, I noticed Mr Moraigne peering down, eavesdropping, as it were. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,828
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Conradian : the Journal of the Joseph Conrad SocietyMême sujetJoseph Conrad and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207